David,
I moved IXGLOGR HLQ to a user catalog years ago without any problem.
RRST is probably the Resource Recovery Servives address space.
Hope this helps,
Paul
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:14 -0400, Mueller, David
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use IXGLOGR as the HLQ for the logger datasets.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:11:20 +0800, Tommy Tsui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>but can EMC tape backup solution can perform a VTS peer to peer mode real
>time copy...immedaitely mode? for mainframe platform
>From EMC literature:
Using EMC replication capabilities, tape volumes stored on Celerr
Hello Frank,
We've been using the EMC (Bustech) MDL solution for about 9 months now.
It's been a nice solution for onsite backups, reducing dump processing time
greatly.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acc
Hi Melissa,
Try:
23 TCP TN3270 ; Telnet Server << TN3270
Hope this helps,
Paul
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:01:23 -0500, Melissa Perry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Setting up (or attempting to set up) ssl for TN3270 using port 992. What
>should the 'job' name assigned to th
John,
Yes, I'm having difficulties with the SCRT LMS site also. Getting 'page not
found' during at signin.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the mess
Herman,
Is it the SDSF 'SYSID' command you're looking for? "SYSID " where ""
is the other system in your plex.
HTH,
Paul
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:52:55 -0500, Stocker, Herman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>G'day,
>I'm on a 1.4 JES2 system (PLEX) with SDSF what I would like to do is to l
Raquel,
Is it possible that spool volume SPOO04 is full?
I've experienced that if a SYSAFF assigned spool volume fills, other spool
volumes in the JES2 MAS will be used so a given JES2 does not halt. IBM has
confirmed this as a normal operation.
Hope this helps,
Paul
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007
Ulrich,
I'm aware this is not a bug, but an authorization configuration choice on
SYS1.VVDS* datasets...just teasing Tom a bit on his original response to me.
Have a good weekend,
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
ri, 24 Aug 2007 12:20:41 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:49:57 -0500, Paul Dineen wrote:
>
>>As others have shared, the VVDS can be created when the first VSAM
>>allocation occurs...if the job/user has the authority to allocate
SYS1.VVDS.*.
>
>I never
Jon,
We're preparing to test an MDL implementation (Bustech MDL w/EMC storage)
in September. Can't yet offer real experiences other than planning and config.
Let me know if interested or check back in a few weeks.
Paul
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:59:45 -0500, Jon Koenigs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As others have shared, the VVDS can be created when the first VSAM
allocation occurs...if the job/user has the authority to allocate SYS1.VVDS.*.
An admin with authority preallocating the VVDS makes it a non-issue.
Paul
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:06:45 +0200, R.S.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>VVD
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:35:57 -0500, Dave Kopischke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:23:56 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
>>I might have to look at capping if we go further down the SCRT and
>>perhaps zNALC route, but for now, no hard capping.
>>
>
>You might seriously consider ove
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:30:48 -0500, Robert Justice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>shock and surprise, my sev1 records about web ibmlink "availability" have
>magically disappeared. I list all of my records and they don't show up.
>Hmm, if all problem records are deleted, does that mean there's been no
This site 'happily' accepted my SCRT report this morning. It does seem
problematic now though.
Paul
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:20:44 -0400, Ken Porowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Anyone having trouble accessing IBMs LMS site?
>
>http://www.ibm.com/software/lms
>
>I've been trying all day and
Yes, I have received the same.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
)
Hope this helps,
Paul Dineen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
Check out the 4/19 Mainstar press release regarding TJX and z/OS:
http://www.mainstar.com/pdf/000-0123_Security_PR.pdf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the me
Willie,
Assuming the valid ICKDSF abreviation for 'IXVTOC' is 'IX',
the job looks good. Give it a shot.
Paul
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:10:51 -0800, willie bunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hallo All,
>
> I have noticed that on 2 of our volumes (3390 -9) the vtoc index got
disabled. Below is
ich may
have been affected by OA17875, but is handy in determining possible
problem scope.
Other APARs of interest regarding large format support possibly adversely
affecting 'non-large' datasets are OA17290 and its companions OA17365 and
OA17370.
Hope this helps,
Paul Dineen
On
Norman,
You may want to peruse Redbook "z/OS Planned Outage Avoidance Checklist"
published Aug. 21.
HTH, Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
Francois,
As long as you've applied coexistence/fallback service and handled any
documented migration actions for JES2, there should be no need to reformat
your spool for a z/OS 1.4 to 1.7 transition.
Just completed the z/OS 1.7 implementations here this weekend and am on
the same spools as us
Jim,
Here is sample of a 'batch TSO' job I use to customize a ROOT mounted
at '/newroot' with directory mountpoints and symbolic links:
//TSOB EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.SBPXEXEC
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOU
Thanks Ben. This FDRABR customer with an August z/OS 1.7 production
implementation planned appreciates the 'heads up'.
Just wondering...Did you actually experience the problem or identify the
APAR via proactive monitoring of service availability?
Paul
-
Yes Sam, the catalog autotune is cool.
It reminds me of a product I had in a previous shop which did the
tuning for any VSAM clusters desired.
Hmmm...If IBM can do this for catalogs, wouldn't it be a nice z/OS
enhancement to buffer tuning for all VSAM datasets (with PARMLIB
dataset specification
Mark,
Follow this thread backwards to learn about the DFSMS 'global connect'
prohibiting the deletion of a PDSE LNKLST'd at IPL. Also pay attention to
the warnings mentioned by many, know the environment you're doing this,
etc.
Paul
---
Thanks to all who've offered their thoughts.
To Peter Relson, let me apologize if I've added to your frustration level
in any way, shape or form. This is/was not my intent, I'm just trying to
understand why a new and improved DSORG prohibits actions allowed with an
older DSORG. I'm hoping you
Walt,
Regarding the concern of stopping MIM, the LPAR where MIM is stopped is a
SYSPROG only environment and MIM is not stopped in test or prod LPARs.
Anyone taking the risk of stopping MIM understands the risk, is working
alone in the LPAR and the stoppage is for a very short period. Don't
Jim,
Thanks for the reminder about program objects requiring PDSEs, something
not when considering the possiblity of converting PDSE's to PDS.
Paul
>> 3) Converting IBM PDSEs back to PDS (with each version - annually
>here).
>
>You cannot do this. IBM PDSEs may contain members which use
Hello,
I'm wondering if others have had difficulty with PDSE's which are included
in LNKLST at IPL time, specifically deletion of them?
There have been times where a LNKLST'd PDS needs expansion: the dataset can
be 'dequeued' via "SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE", stopping LLA and (in this
shop) MIM
While this problem was not applicable at my site...I too got the IBM EMAIL
a week and a half after a potential problem.
Thanks to Brian Petersen who reported the issue to this list on 3/31 prior
to the clock change. The contributers here continue to deliver daily
value, sharing experiences whi
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:43:53 -0500, Ed Micucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear Fellow Respirers,
>
>Has anyone tried SHOWZOS v712? ...under z/OS 1.7?
>If so, have you gotten any s0c1's when running it?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Ed Micucci
>
>---
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:44:01 -0600, Mark Steely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Are we going to need to do an IPL or will the system use the free ASID's
>to start an Address Space?
>
If you have sufficient free until next scheduled IPL, you're OK. But
as 'Init and Tuning Ref' states:
If started ta
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:02:28 -0600, Mark Steely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We are z/OS V1R4. Last night we received the message:
>
>IEA061E REPLACEMENT ASID SHORTAGE HAS BEEN DETECTED
>
>The manual states that the RSVNONR is used to replace entries that are
>marked non-reusable. I understand why w
The post on IBMLINK has been updated (hacked?). I don't believe IBM will
be too happy.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
You might also try a GOOGLE search for PUAUXMON (A cheap Auxiliary Storage
Monitor) found in a Xephon publication.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the m
bSphere, you'll want to assure MQ APAR
PQ97936 / PTF UK01506 is in place for MQ 5.3.1. It has reduced our 'above
16MB usage' greatly, by .8 - .9 GB.
Paul Dineen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acce
rocks) Zelden described
earlier this month that he was setting a MEMLIMIT for z/OS 1.6, WAS 5.1
and DB2 V8. Mark, any insight on whether you have WAS 5.1 exploiting 64-
bit? This would be a great patch for a shop with a production problem.
Hope this info helps you and we also can gain more ins
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:46:24 -0500, Andy Robertson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Any one got a copy they can bung me? (Ghastly grin) Any format.
>
>
>Yes we have tried RCNVTCAT. For reasons too complex to explain we only
>have the LISTCAT output, not the catalog any more.
>
Andy,
I have a copy
>
>Mark,
>
>Care to bet who will be the first?
>
>Ed
>
Ed,
I'm sure there are others, probably Mark as seem to recall gleaning some
info from him during planning, but we implemented one in Feb.
In fact, my PHB (just kidding Bruce) had me review his upcoming CMG
presentation "Getting zAAPed" this
>> Just curious... do the vendors who charge fees by capacity take the
>> zAAP processor into consideration?
>>
>> Ed
Ed,
IBM does recommend checking with your vendor, but there are no software
charges as zAAP engine is JAVA specific. Now if you're vendor software is
JAVA based, I'd guess you ma
Bill,
A zAAP (zSeries Application Assist Processor) is a processor engine which
absorbs a percentage of JAVA workload, available for z990/z890. A large
benefit of a zAAP is that OS software charges don't apply to it's use.
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zaap/
Paul
--
It's been a while since I've had access to the product, but believe
FILEAID can do VSAM renames via their 'ISPF 3.4' equivalent panel.
Can a FILEAID customer validate?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructi
z990 Compatibilty Support allowed a customer to define the new processor
type 2084 (z990) or 2086 (z890) from an existing processor using HCD and
then run z/OS on the new processor without taking advantage of new z900
features. The new z990 features would be available under Exploitation
Support.
Charlie,
Here's a handy REXX exec which will display values including OS level.
Hope this helps.
Paul Dineen
/* REXX TO DISPLAY SYSTEM INFO: PJD 10/25/99*/
SAY " "
SAY " "
SAY "MVSID = "MVSVAR('SYSNAME') " SMFID= "MVSVAR(
44 matches
Mail list logo
