Hi all,
I have the following piece of code running on many SRBs to give
serialisation.
SETLOCK OBTAIN,
TYPE=CML,ASCB=(11), PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE
MODE=UNCOND,
Sorry should have added.
My situation, multiple SRBs in a single address space, some of which might be
non-dispatchable, doesn't appear to match any of the subcodes of the S073 abend.
I suspect this will be some variant of s073 but not 100% sure.
Ron.
volumes it is given
at install time.
Regards, Ron MacRae.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Mark,
Your CLIST is almost identical to my REXX exec. Except I have to push
the TSOLIB command onto the stack as it won't run under rexx, even with an
address TSO in front, and I therefore also push ISPF as well.
I tried typing in your commands at the TSO ready prompt. Still no joy
Hi all,
I've got a REXX exec that sets up an IPCS environment for z/OS levels
other than my current release. We have SYSRES volumes for every release but
don't have all the levels IPLed. With this REXX exec I can select a version of
IPCS modules/panels/ for every release of z/OS
Hi all,
I hope someone can clear up some confusion on my part.
In the jes log for running jobs and stcs messages are produced of the format -
18.36.58 STC01465 SATURDAY, 30 APR 2011
...snip...
00.00.05 STC01465 SUNDAY,01 MAY 2011
...snip...
00.00.05 STC01465
or is the only place you
can get them on the online book manager site as HTML?
That's not much use as it's s slow and the format is poor.
Regards, Ron MacRae
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:15:45 +0200, Leopold Strauss leopold.stra...@isis-
PAPYRUS.COM wrote:
Look at this:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/IEA2BK91?
FS=TRUE
Leo,
That's exactly what I don't want to use as it's slow and poorly formatted.
I want to be able to
Shane,
Thanks. I've downloaded the Data Areas manuals, but as you say
they're a) PDF and b) not indexed into Librarian/reader, although I guess I can
build an index too.
Perhaps someone in IBM, or anyone else in the know, can comment on -
Why the Data Areas stuff was dropped from
Hi all,
I'm trying to debug an S0C4 from a JAVA program from a CEEDUMP. I'm
more familiar with SYSMDUMPs etc.
I'm getting - Current Condition:
CEE3204S The system detected a protection exception (System Completion
Code=0C4).
and
Machine State:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:41:35 -0500, McKown, John
jmck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
The newest Kindle DX from Amazon can be used to store and read normal
PDF manuals. I am considering this device and loading all my z/OS manuals
onto it instead of lugging around a laptop or other, larger, device.
are
looking for an unbiased opinion on the company then I guess you'll need to go
elsewhere, the website mentions quite a few customers.)
Regards, Ron MacRae, ex Amdahl, ex Softek, ex Fujitsu, ex ObjectStar
currently working in the UK for Tibco Software
individually I get the correct, uncataloged, files
allocated.
If I allocate both together I get the cataloged versions.
What am I doing wrong?
How do you allocate multiple uncataloged versions of datasets?
Thanks in advance,
Ron MacRae
the numbers you quote it seems it is possible for XCF to significantly
outperform TCPIP, which is the question I was asking, so it is going to be
worth my company's time to investigage further why our XCF response times
are so poor.
Thanks for your time input.
Regards, Ron MacRae
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:21:44 +0200, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you're running a sysplex, it is always a good idea to tune XCF (as far as
that goes), but keep in mind that my response time numbers are for the
ISGLOCK structure. We monitor that because it transfers almost no data
or would
TCPIP do just as well for that?
Regards, Ron MacRae.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
hardware etc we could get it in line with
TCPIP but even if we tune things to the Nth degree and throw hardware at
the issue what sort of response times can we hope to see?
Regards, Ron MacRae.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Just be greatfull it's a URL and the whole document is not in the email!!
Ron.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:44:20 +0200, Sarel Swanepoel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
this path before, and if so what joy did you get?
Regards, Ron MacRae.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
the wierd
world, which I'm slowly being dragged into kicking and screaming.
Ron MacRae, ex Amdahl, ex Fujitsu, ex ObjectStar, currently Tibco.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
of options, well worth
spending the time to RTFM. There is some stuff in the MVS IPCS commands
book and more in the Language Environment Debugging Guide
If you need all the specific registers at all levels you need to run the R13
save
area chain.
Regards, Ron MacRae.
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:21
-use them.
What changes, presumably in RMM, can have caused the ARC0261I msgs to start?
Thanks in advance,
Ron MacRae
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
supported levels?
If this is all documented somewhere perhaps you could point me at the doc.
Regards, Ron MacRae.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
to determine if SDB is getting it right.
Regards, Ron MacRae
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
Appologies if anyone got this twice, it didn't seem to come through first
time.
Guys,
At the time that real 3390s were replaced by RVA/ICEBERG DASD we threw
away all our DASD allocation guidelines on blocksizes and space allocation
as RVA compressed the track anyway before storing only the
25 matches
Mail list logo