On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:23:17 +, Ted MacNEIL
wrote:
>>Some folks have asked about how to delete all members from a PDS
>>without
>deleting the PDS. I just stumbled across this while doing a receive
>from ServerPac CPP.
>
>IDCAMS:
>
>DELETE MY.PDS(*)
>
>I have a few REXX programmes using tha
>I'm involved in a discussion (read "argument") with co-workers where
I'm
>currently doing a consulting gig.
>Which is more effieient for CLIST/REXX libraries? the choices are
>"RECFM=FB, LRECL=255" or "RECFM=FB,LRECL=80"?
>I lean toward the VB-format, btt I have at least one person here
>insi
>For any (all) of you who "dislike" the file status "97" - especially
anyone involved in a >VSE to MVS conversion (where this seems to be a
medium-high priority problem), >please consider submitting a "Marketing
Request"
>to IBM and reference the existing SHARE requirement:
>SSLNGC0413615 Optio
:>*
:> MVC ##PRM(4),#Q#ENQ INITIALIZE ENQ PARAMTERS
>>I would make ##PRM bigger. As it is now, the ENQ macro will overlay
the
>>dsname.
Perfect, thanks Binyamin. Changed ##PRM length to cover ENQ
length.WORKS PERFECTLY !!! I was probably clobbering STIMER wait
timenot
Thanks Bob, Edward, Paul and Robert.
Now, If I'm editing a different memberBatch runs like it's supposed
to.
And if I'm editing $ROLL member...BATCH waits because of ENQ on member.
But when I exit $ROLL memberBATCH just sits in wait state. Seems
like once it waits...it's stuck.
Here is s
I have an issue where we a PDS library where many different TSO users
are in ISPF edit and are making coding changes in this PDS library.
Maybe 50 different folks are in ISPF edit (Option 2) and coding away all
day long. When programmers are completed coding and code is ready
to be promotedthe
>>Hey Ted - try losing the petulant Canadian attitude.
>>If it weren't for US marines, you'd all be speaking German and your
currency would the Deutschmark.
>Bull droppings. American jinogoism.
>And, another example of the US only knowing about US history.
>We participated in WWII.
>And, while
Just curiouswhy Oracle over DB2 ?? Is Oracle better ??
Never used Oracle before, only DB2.
>That is interesting. But I am wondering about so-called Oracle Site
>Licenses. From what I have been told, we have such a thing. Supposedly,
this
>allows us to have basically unlimited numbers of Oracl
>> And I dislike application folks who won't test in my sandbox then
complain when
>> things blow up the first few days after a roll-up.
>> An impasse?
That was the point.
I understand that you guys are very smart folks, but you guys
LOVE to point all problems at application folksits tire
Don Leahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I agree totally. I hate it when programmers incessantly whine about
>> 'environment' changes impacting their code. Still, if the Sysplex
>> change was described to them as 'transparent', then they should be
allowed to
>> grumble about it. For a little whil
10 matches
Mail list logo