Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Lopez, Sharon
We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. Our IBM CE says that it will not need a Power-on-Reset (POR). We are not changing the weights for the lpars within the HMC; we are leaving them as is. How can we verify that the actual

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Srivastava, Rajesh
] On Behalf Of Lopez, Sharon Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Engine increase on the 2097 We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. Our IBM CE says that it will not need a Power-on-Reset (POR). We

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 4 May 2012 14:39:29 +, Lopez, Sharon wrote: We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. ... How can we verify that the actual physical engine has been turned on? Is there a MVS display that will show this or somewhere

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Charles Mills
on the 2097 We are turning on 1 engine this weekend to one of our processors; we are going from a 2097-604 to a 2097-605. Our IBM CE says that it will not need a Power-on-Reset (POR). We are not changing the weights for the lpars within the HMC; we are leaving them as is. How can we verify

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Chip Grantham
, Rajesh rajesh.srivast...@ubs.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 05/04/2012 09:58 AM Subject:Re: Engine increase on the 2097 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu You will have to issue very online command for the added CPU. Issue D M=CPU to verify. You

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread McKown, John
Company.SM -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Engine increase on the 2097 I am wy into territory I know nothing about here

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Skip Robinson
On the z10 (2097) and up, you can dynamically make a new CP available to an LPAR via the HMC. Once that is done, the z/OZ CONFIG command can be issued. Be careful to follow through completely with all steps. We added an engine a while back, but it went offline at the next regular IPL, and we

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Engine increase on the 2097 I am wy into territory I know nothing about here

Re: Engine increase on the 2097

2012-05-04 Thread McKown, John
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Skip Robinson Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Engine increase on the 2097 On the z10 (2097) and up, you can dynamically make a new CP available to an LPAR via the HMC. Once that is done, the z/OZ CONFIG command can

2097, 2098, 2817 Hiper MCL

2011-05-26 Thread Jousma, David
RL: Hiper SPR: Todd Voltz Document Number: 5/23/11 Machine Type: 2097, 2098, 2817 Models Affected: All Models RETAIN TIP: H202878 ABSTRACT: HIPER MCLs have been released for machines at Driver-86 and Driver-79. DESCRIPTION: HIPER MCLs have been released

Re: 2097?

2008-02-26 Thread McKown, John
Well, according to the announcement today, a 2097 is a z10 EC. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged

Re: 2097?

2008-02-26 Thread Marian Gasparovic
Yes, and so somebody who did not trust D M=CPU can trust it again... On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, according to the announcement today, a 2097 is a z10 EC. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise

2097?

2008-02-14 Thread Phil Payne
I'm glad I didn't post this - I'm a bit bored with having my throat jumped down. First of all, some systems are soft. Flex-ES and Hercules could be trivially modded to store such values. Secondly, even if '2097' were the designator of some future IBM system, it doesn't follow

Re: 2097?

2008-02-14 Thread Van Dalsen, Herbie
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Payne Sent: 14 Februarie 2008 03:43 nm To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: 2097? I'm glad I didn't post this - I'm a bit bored with having my throat jumped down. First of all, some systems are soft. Flex-ES

Re: 2097?

2008-02-13 Thread Sebastian Welton
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:09:22 -0600, Tom Moulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up as a z/HE in a CPU display (D M=CPU). The ZHE is the CPC (or processor name) which you define via the HCD so unless you did this then it could well

Re: 2097?

2008-02-13 Thread Wegemer, John R
The company I was previously associated with received one of these boxes in mid December as part of an early support program. I saw very few documents regarding this machine but it was listed as ZHE. It is supposedly the next generation of IBM mainframe.

Re: 2097?

2008-02-13 Thread Marian Gasparovic
z9 EC has modes S08, S18 etc but the machine type is always 2094 z9 BC has models R07 and S07, machine type is always 2096 so every z9 EC reports 2094 and every z9BC reports 2096 Then you have capacity settings, like 508, 715, 754 etc for z9 EC and like A01, Q03 etc for z9 BC. They are also

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Ted MacNEIL
The z9EC model number is 2097. No, it isn't. The z9EC model number is 2094; the z9BC number is 2096. My bad. I can only attribute it to a bad memory and being off the job for 8 months. - Too busy driving to stop for gas

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL The z9EC model number is 2097. That's interesting Our z9EC claims to be a 2094. -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:20:22 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote: The z9EC model number is 2097. No, it isn't. The z9EC model number is 2094; the z9BC number is 2096. -- Tom Schmidt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Barry
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:32:43 -0800, Lars Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Moulder wrote: How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up as a z/HE in a CPU display (D M=CPU). What is it and how does it stack up against all the other z9 machines? Slide number 10

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Tony Harminc
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:10:10 -0600, Tom Moulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CPC NAME = ZHE Hmmm... ZHÈ is a Chinese word for this. So maybe it's just self identifying. Tony H. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Tom Schmidt
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:10:10 -0600, Tom Moulder wrote: CPC NAME = ZHE z/HE might be a name used if the new box was closer to the size of a washing machine than a refrigerator; my washer is a High Efficiency model (HE)... so why not the next mainframe? (One reason not to go that route

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Ted MacNEIL
And our z9BC claims to be a 2096-S07-T03. I googled and IBM-searched, but I got no answers. If somebody did, could they please send me either a link or their search arguments? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Tom Moulder
, Chris Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 2097? Can you cut and paste the display, please? Chris Blaicher -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Moulder Sent: Tuesday, February 12

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Lars Poulsen
Tom Moulder wrote: How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up as a z/HE in a CPU display (D M=CPU). What is it and how does it stack up against all the other z9 machines? Slide number 10 in this presentation should answer your questions in some detail: http

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Blaicher, Chris
Can you cut and paste the display, please? Chris Blaicher -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Moulder Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: 2097? How many of you have heard of an IBM z9

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Ted MacNEIL
The z9EC model number is 2097. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -Original Message- From: Tom Moulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:09:22 To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: 2097? How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Shane
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:09 -0600, Tom Moulder wrote: How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up as a z/HE in a CPU display (D M=CPU). It just might not be a z9 ... Now tell us Tom, how did you get hold of one of those ... already ???. Looks like a (public) d'oh

2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Tom Moulder
How many of you have heard of an IBM z9 model number 2097? It shows up as a z/HE in a CPU display (D M=CPU). What is it and how does it stack up against all the other z9 machines? Tom Moulder No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus

Re: 2097?

2008-02-12 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:44:43 -0600, Chase, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL The z9EC model number is 2097. That's interesting Our z9EC claims to be a 2094. And our z9BC claims to be a 2096-S07-T03. What has the world