In <4fc7e1b0.6070...@trainersfriend.com>, on 05/31/2012
at 03:25 PM, Steve Comstock said:
>I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
>that maybe someone can explain.
Are all of your datasets supposed to be SMS managed? If so, there is
an ACS issue. If not, it has always worked that way.
On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:31:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
>
>> Something has to specify the UNIT. Does "LIKE" establish the
>> UNIT but not the VOL? Strange.
>
>LIKE establishes neither; UNIT comes from the system default
>unit, usually SYSALLDA; VOL is chosen from available storage
>volumes.
On 5/31/2012 4:13 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
On 5/31/2012 5:26 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMAST DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=&SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
//
On 5/31/2012 4:59 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:45:54 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
There is a parmlib option to abend NOT CATLG 2. I recommend using it.
Would this cause the ABEND at the beginning or at the end of the job step?
The latter would be suboptimal.
IMO, SMS shoul
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:45:54 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>There is a parmlib option to abend NOT CATLG 2. I recommend using it.
>
Would this cause the ABEND at the beginning or at the end of the job step?
The latter would be suboptimal.
>IMO, SMS should be set up for all allocations and the fallb
On 5/31/2012 5:26 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMAST DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=&SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
// LIKE=STNT329.TRAIN.ZINPUTA
Job runs fine a
nformation Technology Services
Washington State University
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Allocation myster
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:25:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
>I run a job that creates a new data set using
>this DD statement:
>
>//NEWMASTDD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=&SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
>// LIKE=STNT329.TRAIN.ZINPUTA
>
>Job runs fine and creates the new file.
Is the data set SMS mana
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMASTDD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=&SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
// LIKE=STNT329.TRAIN.ZINPUTA
Job runs fine and creates the new file.
Now I run
9 matches
Mail list logo
