In 466682.32875...@web161405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on 05/17/2011
at 10:19 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
One the other hand 3 pages is just plain overkill. A simple URL
would have suficed
Unless it is rather large or there are currency issue, a quote is
preferable to a URL.
--
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
In 105438.15379...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on 05/15/2011
at 09:47 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
People write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought
to be conveyed.
Some people do, sometimes. Some people sometimes write perfectly
Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 4:32:13 AM
Subject: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
Hello Kees,
thank you for your answer, which helps me very much. Is DLF an
option to cache
the member data?
Or - if i convert the Dataset to PDS/E and use its caching, is it
usefull to
leave the Dataset
In 105438.15379...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on 05/15/2011
at 09:47 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
People write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought
to be conveyed.
Some people do, sometimes. Some people sometimes write perfectly
understandable sentence fragments.
In 009f01cc1355$5b8989b0$129c9d10$@hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net, on
05/15/2011
at 04:11 PM, Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net said:
One could complain that there are some on the list that reply
frequently, but don't actually add anything of value to the subject
when they do.
Or that add
In 488338.78331...@web161408.mail.bf1.yahoo.com, on 05/13/2011
at 09:57 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com said:
We seem to have a at least on contributor that answers with one word
answers and you are left puzzling what he really means half the time
that you have to spend 30 minutes analyzing
Shmuel,
Not really.
One could complain that there are some on the list that reply frequently,
but don't actually add anything of value to the subject when they do.
That works for short and long responses.
Ron
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that
---SNIP-
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that it's too long.
No. :)
-SNIP---
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that it's too long.
--
It is the word word replies (sorry I couldn't resist the first reply). People
write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought to be conveyed.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
---SNIP-
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that it's too long.
No. :)
Ed,
I consider that cheaper and a lot less cumbersome than VLF.
I was at one place and they had a good size turnover of Sysprogs and none
of
them even thought about VLF after applying fixes.
There was a decent number of head scratching as to why fixes didn't fix.
[Ron Hawkins]
VLF caching
Follow up to this question.
Has anyone put the ISPF (load libs) in VLF and found it to help TSO response
time?
Ed
From: Monika Amiss monika.am...@arcor.de
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 4:32:13 AM
Subject: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:33:35 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Follow up to this question.
Has anyone put the ISPF (load libs) in VLF and found it to help TSO response
time?
Ed
For many years. They are in the LNKLST, so they get LLA and VLF benefit.
I put other ISPLLIBs in the LNKLST
: non-module-PDS and VLF
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:33:35 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Follow up to this question.
Has anyone put the ISPF (load libs) in VLF and found it to help TSO response
time?
Ed
For many years. They are in the LNKLST, so they get LLA and VLF benefit.
I put other
Hello Kees,
thank you for your answer, which helps me very much. Is DLF an option to
cache the member data?
Or - if i convert the Dataset to PDS/E and use its caching, is it usefull to
leave the Dataset in LLA?
With best regards
Monika
- Original Nachricht
Von:
15 matches
Mail list logo
