Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

To those of you who helped me with this problem earlier: thank you. After a bout of illness, I resumed working on our transfer and eventually -- with the help of the sysadmin at the server site -- got it working. Morals of the story: 1) Google is your friend, but he can be a confusing friend.

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

>Also, z/OS UNIX System Service is also UNIX. It was the second OS to get the UNIX95 brand. HP/UX was the first. This was over 10 years ago. z/OS USS IS UNIX. (and, you know which USS I mean all you nit-pickers out there) - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) writes: > What do you mean by "OMVS is not unix"? I'm more curious than anything > else. If you're talking about the TSO OMVS comma

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Betsy Jeffery > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 9:57 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer > > > OMVS is not unix.

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

You are correct. I misspoke about the sshd running. Our developers didn't want to change their JCL. We're actually running lftp under System SSL for both telnet and sftp. I even showed them your dspipes tool and they wouldn't budge. St. Charles, MO - I'm a Lindenwood alum. ---

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

OMVS is not unix. ssh as provided by IBM Ported tools is still ssh (open source) for unix. OMVS 'prohibits' ssh because of this in addition to the fact that straight ssh/sftp does not have a facility to work with MVS data set structure. IBM has been asked to 'fix' this multiple times. IMO th

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

I simplyhave a habit of putting SYSPRINT into just about everthing. If you want to quibble about such things, be my guest. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with t

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/23/2008 at 07:25 PM, Kirk Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >IBM's port of ssh has code that detects an OMVS environment and >explicitly prohibits execution. Ouch! Thanks. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/25/2008 at 09:41 AM, Betsy Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Therefore, sftp does not (and should not if it is to remain open source) >recognize MVS data set structures. There is nothing in GPL2 and similar licenses that prohibits system-dependent code. In fact

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/25/2008 at 11:06 AM, "IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >o What use is SYSPRINT in an IKJEFT01 step? Perhaps not needed in this case, but in general it saves having to allocate and free SYSPRINT every time you want to run a utility. -- Shmuel

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

Betsy , You don't need to run the sshd daemon to use the sftp client from z/OS. Also, even though OpenSSH is open source, it is licensed under a BSD license. IBM is free to modify it as they wish (which they have) and not redistribute their patches. Kirk Wolf On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Bet

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:41:26 -0600, Betsy Jeffery wrote: > >recognize MVS data set structures. You can use sftp in batch but you need >extra steps. First you copy the data, the commands, then execute the >transfer with those 2 files. Here is an example of going from z/OS to Unix: > Lots of comme

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

To execute sftp on z/OS using USS, you will need to install IBM Ported Tools. This is a no cost feature available on the IBM website http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/unix/port_tools.html The ssh daemon has to be running. I have recently set this up at our shop. sftp itself wil

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

at, 23 Feb 2008 19:25:21 -0600 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > > > > IBM's port of ssh has code that detects an OMVS environment and > explicitly > > prohibits execution. Same t

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

CTED] > Subject: Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > > IBM's port of ssh has code that detects an OMVS environment and explicitly > prohibits execution. Same thing for the sftp command, as it uses 'ssh' > under the covers. > >

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

IBM's port of ssh has code that detects an OMVS environment and explicitly prohibits execution. Same thing for the sftp command, as it uses 'ssh' under the covers. Try either one and you get: FOTS1252 The SSH client cannot be run under OMVS. FOTS0841 Connection closed Its a big secret as to wh

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/22/2008 at 11:17 AM, Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >It is not possible to start an ssh session from within OMVS under TSO. Do you mean that the code does not support it, or only that there are configuration issues that prevent it? What is the specific obstac

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

Thanks Kirk I will try this. Bill -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 4:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer Bill, This is a nice example, but

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

ease contact me and I will send you a copy of the > IBM Ported Tools manauls. > And some other doc if you want it. > > Also open an ETR with IBM and they were very helpful getting this to > work. > > Bill Miller > Great West Casualty Company > 1100 West 29th Street

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:17:13 -0500, Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that can be run >under scheduler control to transmit this file when it is generated. If >I am reading the correct information, though, it is not possible to do >this in

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

without user intervention. -Original Message- From: Jon Brock Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 8:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Batch job to perform sftp transfer WE have a need to begin electronically sending data to a state agency which has formerly received a tape from us. They

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rugen, Len > > Remember sftp is not equal to ftpssl. Sorry; I "ass.u.me"d the objective was only to accomplish an encrypted file transfer via scheduled batch job, and didn't perceive "sftp" specifically as a "h

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

ul getting this to work. Bill Miller Great West Casualty Company 1100 West 29th Street South Sioux City, NE 68776 Phone: 402-494-7354 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock Sent: Friday, February

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

t FTP using TLS. Larry Gray Large Systems Engineering Lowe's Companies 336-658-7944 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 11:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Batch job to pe

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

Sorry; hit too soon > -Original Message- > From: Chase, John > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock > > > > [ snip ] > > > > Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that > can be run > > under scheduler cont

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock > > [ snip ] > > Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that > can be run under scheduler control to transm

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 10:20 -0600, Pat Mihalec wrote: > One of the problems that we encountered was the file/member > that contained the ftp commands has to be set with nonum. > There cannot be anything in column 72-80. FTP thinks this > is data. Going OT, but you can place a semicolon at the end

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock > > [ snip ] > > Ideally, I would like to be able to set up a batch job that > can be run under scheduler control to transmit this file when > it is generated. If I am reading the correct information, >

Re: Batch job to perform sftp transfer

dical Center Senior System Programmer (312) 942-8386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 02/22/2008 10:17 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Batch job to perform sftp transfer WE

Batch job to perform sftp transfer

WE have a need to begin electronically sending data to a state agency which has formerly received a tape from us. They have set up an sftp server on their end and given us the user ID and password they want us to use. I can sign on to their site from Windows and from a Linux guest hosted on our m