Re: Bookmanger Books (was Re: z/OS 1.10 and Data Areas)

2008-12-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/02/2008 at 09:18 AM, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >"BookManager Build for Windows" is flat-out no longer supported by IBM >and will not work with the latest word processor and Java releases. We >have to keep old versions of these around--even old, dedic

Re: Bookmanger Books (was Re: z/OS 1.10 and Data Areas)

2008-12-02 Thread Edward Jaffe
Mark Zelden wrote: Would a few comments on IBM-MAIN help? I've been filling out surveys at SHARE for the last 4 years indicating that I want to keep BookManager format and almost every other sysprog and developer I know has been doing the same thing. Haven't we made our case by now? Is anyone

Bookmanger Books (was Re: z/OS 1.10 and Data Areas)

2008-12-02 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:51:15 -0500, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I would still appreciate your comments regarding "PDF-only" even if it >applies only to potential subsequent releases. > Would a few comments on IBM-MAIN help? I've been filling out surveys at SHARE for the last 4 years