In 053f2631ec9c584883847c8b4970a228059dc...@josqems1.jsq.bsg.ad.adp.com,
on 12/19/2009
at 12:52 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com said:
Small rant Why oh why didn't they ever write QPAM?
Nobody wrote up a business case that they found compelling. Or internal
politics.
If it helps:
you can open a PDS or PDSE without a member name using fopen ()
in binary mode and read the directory. After having read the member names,
you can fopen the individual members, if you want.
Kind regards
Bernd
David Stephens schrieb:
There's no doubt that z/OS specific functions
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z/OS
If it helps:
you can open a PDS or PDSE without a member name using fopen ()
in binary mode and read the directory. After having read the member
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z/OS
Snipped
write an assembler program with FIND, then call
I find it really amusing that IBM simulated a PDS directory for a PDSE.
Why would this be amusing.
PDSE is supposed to be compatable/transparent to applications.
So, how would they do that without simulating a PDS directory?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:29:24 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I find it really amusing that IBM simulated a PDS directory for a PDSE.
Why would this be amusing.
PDSE is supposed to be compatable/transparent to applications.
In that case, any number of readers of this forum can tell you how
widely they
blocks that are not there. But if you are not amused, that's okay too.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 9:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z
and
deblocking and ... (correct me if I'm wrong).
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z/OS
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:25:29 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
Well, we can debate all day what is or is not amusing, but I am not sure
reading the 256-byte directory blocks was a supported programming interface,
so if it had gone away I don't think anyone could have screamed not
compatible.
My
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 11:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z/OS
Thanks. That's a good thought. Yes, first sentence
PDSE is supposed to be compatable/transparent to applications.
In that case, any number of readers of this forum can tell you how widely they
missed the mark.
Yes, I've btdt many times.
Especially since the introduction of non-SMS-Managed PDSE's.
My point was:
of course PDSE is going to
Does anyone know of one lick of documentation *specific to z/OS* for the
subject C++ classes? The words DD and PDS, for example, do not appear
anywhere in IBM z/OS Standard C++ Library Reference. (Well, DD does
appear in the context of date formats.) I don't see one word on the filename
formats
2009/12/18 Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org:
Does anyone know of one lick of documentation *specific to z/OS* for the
subject C++ classes? The words DD and PDS, for example, do not appear
anywhere in IBM z/OS Standard C++ Library Reference. (Well, DD does
appear in the context of date formats.)
The IBM z/OS Standard C++ Library Reference. documents the STL and other
industry standard C++ functions. It does not document (to my examination)
any IBM specific facilities.
Sam
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
2009/12/18 Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org:
: Re: C++ fstream, iostream and z/OS
2009/12/18 Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org:
Does anyone know of one lick of documentation *specific to z/OS* for the
subject C++ classes? The words DD and PDS, for example, do not appear
anywhere in IBM z/OS Standard C++ Library Reference. (Well, DD does
appear
There's no doubt that z/OS specific functions aren't documented that
well, but the Run-Time Library Reference is where it all is. Functions
are for both C and C++. It includes some z/OS specific functions like
__cabend (abend a process) and _malloc24 (getmain storage below the
line), but you
16 matches
Mail list logo
