In listserv%201105071107353825.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/07/2011
at 11:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
USS (only an A-R moron would raise the specter of ambiguity or
impopriety given the manifest context)
Only a drunk fool would make that claim.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
In 4dc40fe7.3080...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 05/06/2011
at 08:12 AM, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
When we first implemented this function in (E)JES, we learned first
hand just how much dislike/distrust there is out there re: USS
filesystems.
While Unix files are poorly
The main reason that I like z/OS UNIX is: it helps to keep the mainframe
viable until I have to retire.
I use to have a job where I could monitor IBM-Main during the work day so
I#39;ve missed out on the lively USS vs USS discussion. As per usual Ed Jaffe
had the best response ;-)
I
Like a few others, I put up with whatever IBM marketing comes up
with for their (pseudo) posix compliant bolt-on.
That image of a mouse with the human ear (cartilage) grafted on to its
back springs immediately to mind.
Better approximation might be something cancerous ...
MVS in one corner,
A date format with the month first. Who would be that stupid?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
David Alcock
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 6:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Dislike/Distrust of USS
On Sun, 8 May 2011 00:34:07 +1000, Shane wrote:
Like a few others, I put up with whatever IBM marketing comes up
with for their (pseudo) posix compliant bolt-on.
I have some sympathy with the pseudo part. Particularly, I
wish USS (only an A-R moron would raise the specter of ambiguity
or
David Alcock wrote:
I thought about the mainframe when I saw this Dilbert:
http://www.dilbert.com/2011-04-23/
If you used that file naming standard starting with month-year-date, you're
working on a 'Pain-frame', not on a Mainframe... ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
[Reposted for those who either prefer or hate the USS acronym. You choose :-) ]
On 5/6/2011 6:28 AM, John McKown wrote:
I would like the concensus of opinion on something for SDSF. There is an
function to print sysout to a dataset. This is ususally done with the XD
line command or the PRT ODSN
I think some hate z/OS UNIX simply because it is something more that I have
to be bothered with. Management seems to want to minimize their
responsibilities. I remember loving new things. Now we hate them because
they make our jobs more demanding while not increasing our pay. Speaking
generically
Edward
In a conference call, I demonstrated how their users could already easily
create/update USS files using native ISPF functions (e.g., EDIT) ...
If you need something like this again and you're too busy to do it yourself,
I'd
be happy to help out. Just let me know.
A guess most people
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Dislike/Distrust of USS (Was: Opinion: modified SDSF
functionality?)
I think some hate z/OS UNIX simply because it is something more that I
Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 11:12:39 AM
Subject: Dislike/Distrust of USS (Was: Opinion: modified SDSF functionality?)
[Reposted for those who either prefer or hate the USS acronym. You choose :-) ]
On 5/6/2011 6:28 AM, John McKown wrote:
I would
12 matches
Mail list logo
