W dniu 2012-06-10 22:37, Andy Wood pisze:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:48:50 +0200, R.S.r.skoru...@snip.com.pl
wrote:
[snipped]
I am quite prepared to accept that mainframe workers would know that
it is not a good idea to reuse passwords in that way.
However, that was not my point when I said that
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:48:50 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
. . .
So, a user provides new password, the password is hashed (i.e. using SHA
function) and the hash is stored. The result: you can compare hash from
databse with hash of password-provided-during-logon. You cannot
On 7 Jun 2012 14:28:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:55:51 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Having password or not is not matter of topic of IBM-MAIN.
There are really a lot of things which do have passwords and are
absolutely unrelated to
Clark Morris wrote:
Would you mind explaining further what unsalted passwords are?
It's not unsalted passwords, it's unsalted hashes. The salt means added
entropy (randomness). For example, when the password for
clark.mor...@company.commailto:clark.mor...@company.com is hashed, you might
add
LinkedIn passwords hacked
On 7 Jun 2012 14:28:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:55:51 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Having password or not is not matter of topic of IBM-MAIN.
There are really a lot of things which do have passwords
W dniu 2012-06-08 22:02, Clark Morris pisze:
On 7 Jun 2012 14:28:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
[...]
Yet some smug mainframe workers could learn something from this. Such as,
storing hashed but unsalted passwords is not such a good idea (and, yes, I have
seen that done on a
Hammers, football games, and panties don't usualy have passwords. LinkedIn
isn't as pervasive as Yahoo, but does serve a higher value clientel, at least
in the US.
Major portals such as Yahoo, Google+, Hotmail, etc all do and I would say that
getting the word out about a major breech is a
Having password or not is not matter of topic of IBM-MAIN.
There are really a lot of things which do have passwords and are
absolutely unrelated to mainframes.
We are here to discuss mainframe issues, not password problems on
popular portal(s).
However in case of security breach on IBM.com
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:55:51 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
Having password or not is not matter of topic of IBM-MAIN.
There are really a lot of things which do have passwords and are
absolutely unrelated to mainframes.
We are here to discuss mainframe issues, not password
9 matches
Mail list logo
