In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005bde01...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom, on
02/01/2010
at 12:55 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Thanks for all that information. If TEE was so difficult to implement, I
shudder to think about my UNIX SUBSYS= functionality! I wonder about
doing
I think we could use the GPSAM routines from the CBT tape to create the
TEE function.
Both versions of this (CBT files 290 and 648) appear to have been written in
1982. I haven't tried using the code on our z/OS 1.9 system, but they use
some questionable means of locating and modifying control
Thanks for all that information. If TEE was so difficult to implement, I
shudder to think about my UNIX SUBSYS= functionality! I wonder about doing
something hinkey in OPEN. OPEN can open multiple DCBs in a single SVC. So, I
wonder if it does it them sequentially. If so, I wonder if it would be
I wonder about doing something hinkey in OPEN. OPEN can open multiple
DCBs in a single SVC. So, I wonder if it does it them sequentially. If so, I
wonder if it would be possible to dynamically add my DCBs onto the end of
the list. Probably not something that would be long term viable.
Since the
- Original Message -
From: Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Friday thought - a couple of SUBSYS= subsystems for discussion.
I think we could use the GPSAM routines from the CBT tape to create the
Martin Kline provided a response that would probably work.
That being said, and having been there, done that, I wouldn't
go there. Other folks have other views.
These days, that subsystem code has a support status of:
If it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.
Looking back across four
In listserv%201001291001530009.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 01/29/2010
at 10:01 AM, Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com said:
I can think of a couple other solutions using out-of-the-box methods, but
neither is as clean as what you're proposing. You'd need a minimum
number of subsystem routines - JCL
snip--
Doesn't FREEPOOL test whether there is a buffer pool before trying to
free it?
unsnip-
That's a fairly recent refinement to the FREEPOOL macro. For many years
there
I think we could use the GPSAM routines from the CBT tape to create the
TEE function.
Ken G.
McKown, John wrote:
OK, it is Friday. And this is on topic. It may even be interesting. I was
thinking of two possible SUBSYS= subsystems to use, especially on batch jobs.
OK, it is Friday. And this is on topic. It may even be interesting. I was
thinking of two possible SUBSYS= subsystems to use, especially on batch jobs.
One I call TEE. The other I call UNIX.
The TEE subsystem is inspired(?) by the UNIX tee command. The tee command reads
its stdin and sends it
I can think of a couple other solutions using out-of-the-box methods, but
neither is as clean as what you're proposing. You'd need a minimum number of
subsystem routines - JCL processing, allocation, open and close, and maybe
another couple. At OPEN time, issue OPENs for the related files,
11 matches
Mail list logo
