In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 05/11/2005
at 07:10 AM, "Richards.Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I agree with you that it should not go on, but it does. Not in
>meetings, but in hallway conversations. I have been involved with
>several mixed-vendor implementations and not one of them was cut and
>dried. Everything *eventually* works, but all things being equal, I
>simply prefer a single vendor solution. In my experience, they have
>gone smoothly, regardless of vendor.
You can get that even in a single vendor environment, e.g., the IBM
hardware CE trying to fob off a machine check as a software error. A
machine check that occurs even in single step mode!
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
