HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Andy White
We had a problem on Monday morning which was a bit of a surprised. Over the weekend we installed z/OS 1.13 on all of our remaining systems. Thought i'd pass along as a 'heads up'. We didn't see much about this in any of the migration manuals or from SHARE we attended. We had on our sysplex

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Darth Keller
Andy - What adjustments to you plan to make to GRS for this? Can you provide any additional information about the 'lock up'? From the information you provided from your ETR, it seems that HSM wouldn't totally lock up, but that some functions would appear to be delayed or possibly 'locked'

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Andy White
Sorry here is what IBM recommended for us to change ACTION TAKEN: Reviewed the dumps and found that the ARCGPA/ARCCAT resource was being propagated as a SYSTEMS ENQ. that this resource needs to remain a SYSTEM ENQ. Recommended that to remove the ARCGPA entry from the GRS INCLUDE RNL (which

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Skip Robinson
:Re: HSM z/OS 1.13 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sorry here is what IBM recommended for us to change ACTION TAKEN: Reviewed the dumps and found that the ARCGPA/ARCCAT resource was being propagated as a SYSTEMS ENQ. that this resource needs to remain

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: HSM z/OS 1.13 Sorry here is what IBM recommended for us to change ACTION TAKEN: Reviewed the dumps and found that the ARCGPA/ARCCAT resource was being propagated as a SYSTEMS ENQ. that this resource needs to remain a SYSTEM ENQ. Recommended that to remove the ARCGPA entry

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Andy White
] Re: [IBM-MAIN] HSM z/OS 1.13 Veilleux, Jon L to: IBM-MAIN 04/10/2012 10:59 AM Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List Andy, I have a couple of questions from our MIM support person: Do you know

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Mark Jacobs
-0595 Mobile jo.skip.robin...@sce.com From: Andy Whiteawh...@metlife.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 04/10/2012 05:48 AM Subject:Re: HSM z/OS 1.13 Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion ListIBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sorry here is what IBM recommended for us to change ACTION TAKEN

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:16:56 -0400, Andy White awh...@metlife.com wrote: We had a problem on Monday morning which was a bit of a surprised. Over the weekend we installed z/OS 1.13 on all of our remaining systems. Thought i'd pass along as a 'heads up'. We didn't see much about this in any of the

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Thanks much Andy! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Andy White Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: HSM z/OS 1.13 Jon - for the record we don't run MIM native GRS. we run HSM (had

Re: HSM z/OS 1.13

2012-04-10 Thread Andy White
Mark - for the record we don't hold our CDS backups this was why we didn't feel this pertained to us. Andy S. White Description: Before z/OS V1R13, you might have manually or programmatically held DFSMShsm activity using the HOLD command prior to starting a control data set (CDS) backup.