don't you have a preventive maintenance philosophy there? We've had that
fix on since April this year.
Well, I am not responsible for the maintenance policy (which is mainly
'never touch a running system' unless it has a problem). We had ordered zOS
1.6 back in February and wanted to be much
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:12:08 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OA08692 has cost us a 1.4 system when a 1.6 system was IPL'd. It is not
marked hiper and my colleagues tell me that it is not on the list of
toleration maintenance for 1.6
IBM has confirmed a correlation between the 0C4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Heads-up: OA08692
snip
Kidding aside, don't you have a preventive maintenance philosophy
OA08692 has cost us a 1.4 system when a 1.6 system was IPL'd. It is not
marked hiper and my colleagues tell me that it is not on the list of
toleration maintenance for 1.6
IBM has confirmed a correlation between the 0C4 described in there and the
tight loop in memterm tasks in master (RRS memterm
4 matches
Mail list logo