Re: Heads-up: OA08692

2005-11-06 Thread Barbara Nitz
don't you have a preventive maintenance philosophy there? We've had that fix on since April this year. Well, I am not responsible for the maintenance policy (which is mainly 'never touch a running system' unless it has a problem). We had ordered zOS 1.6 back in February and wanted to be much

Re: Heads-up: OA08692

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:12:08 +0100, Barbara Nitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OA08692 has cost us a 1.4 system when a 1.6 system was IPL'd. It is not marked hiper and my colleagues tell me that it is not on the list of toleration maintenance for 1.6 IBM has confirmed a correlation between the 0C4

Re: Heads-up: OA08692

2005-11-04 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Heads-up: OA08692 snip Kidding aside, don't you have a preventive maintenance philosophy

Heads-up: OA08692

2005-11-03 Thread Barbara Nitz
OA08692 has cost us a 1.4 system when a 1.6 system was IPL'd. It is not marked hiper and my colleagues tell me that it is not on the list of toleration maintenance for 1.6 IBM has confirmed a correlation between the 0C4 described in there and the tight loop in memterm tasks in master (RRS memterm