IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Warner Mach
I do not have any direct stake in the FLEX-ES vs IBM issue, but I have been surprised that there does not seem to be much speculation on why IBM is dropping the FLEX-ES connection; just complaints that they are doing so ... Is the reason only known to a few IBM executives? . To fill the void, I

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Rob Scott
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warner Mach Sent: 26 March 2007 09:09 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? I do not have any direct stake in the FLEX-ES vs IBM issue, but I have been surprised that there does not seem to be much speculation on why IBM is dropping the FLEX-ES connection

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Bob Shannon
So, if I were to speculate on an IBM motive, it is to put the small ISV's out of the z/OS development business. Go back to the archives and read the history of this issue before jumping to conclusions. IBM discussed PSI and FLEX-ES at the last Vendor Disclosure meeting. If you need

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Gary DiPillo
Warner, I have a very direct stake in the issue. We (my company) has been a PWD member for many years (1995). We previously used a P390 and upgraded to an IBM Server x235 with the FLEX-ES software. IBM KNOWS this, since the transaction had to be approved by them, and they provide the

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Charles Mills
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warner Mach Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 6:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? I do not have any direct stake in the FLEX-ES vs IBM issue, but I have been surprised

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? snip Perhaps the small vendors are just not strategic to IBM. It's

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why?

2007-03-26 Thread Charles Mills
What a vendor MIGHT do to encourage developers: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2106952,00.asp Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? + ibm-main anamoly

2007-03-26 Thread Steve Comstock
:09 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? I do not have any direct stake in the FLEX-ES vs IBM issue, but I have been surprised that there does not seem to be much speculation on why IBM is dropping the FLEX-ES connection; just complaints that they are doing so

Re: IBM vs Flex-Es - Why? + ibm-main anamoly

2007-03-26 Thread Art Celestini
At 08:53 PM 3/26/2007, Steve Comstock wrote: This seems to be the case with IBM education; they used to hire out a variety of instructors as sub-contractors (including yours truly from time to time). Now they have narrowed the contractors they deal with to a dozen; if you're a small guy you have