Thanks. We'll look into that parameter.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: RES: IEFACTRT exit
And you can try VSM
inits.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 6:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT exit
Initiators have a historic tendency for storage problems, especially the
longer they run
-
|De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de O'Connor, Ruth
|Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2008 16:15
|Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
|Assunto: Re: IEFACTRT exit
|
|Thanks for the information and suggestions. DAE doesn't show
|anything recent for the LPAR
useful. We're wondering if something prevents the IEFACTRT exit from
being called for certain users.
This week the problem has been reported in our applications development
LPAR. For at least 3 userids (or ACIDs in Top Secret terminology) the
messages stopped appearing early Monday morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU Re: IEFACTRT exit
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:19 -0500, O'Connor, Ruth wrote:
Any ideas about what could have happened to the initiator to affect an
smf exit's WTOs?
Have a look at the subpool for any getmains.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
O'Connor, Ruth
Sent: 18 January 2008 15:45
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IEFACTRT exit
Hello
We have an intermittent problem with IEFACTRT and are wondering if anyone else
has ever seen this phenomenon. We're running z/OS 1.7 with Top
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Connor, Ruth
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEFACTRT exit
Richard,
That's a good question. We do use IEFYS to write some messages
the
messages. I have looked through the exit code without finding anything
useful. We're wondering if something prevents the IEFACTRT exit from
being called for certain users.
This week the problem has been reported in our applications development
LPAR. For at least 3 userids (or ACIDs in Top Secret
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:44:55 -0500, O'Connor, Ruth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello
We have an intermittent problem with IEFACTRT and are wondering if
anyone else has ever seen this phenomenon. We're running z/OS 1.7 with
Top Secret 9.0 but the problem goes back at least several years and
without finding anything
useful. We're wondering if something prevents the IEFACTRT exit from
being called for certain users.
This week the problem has been reported in our applications development
LPAR. For at least 3 userids (or ACIDs in Top Secret terminology) the
messages stopped appearing early
: IEFACTRT exit
O'Connor, Ruth wrote:
Hello
We have an intermittent problem with IEFACTRT and are wondering if
anyone else has ever seen this phenomenon. We're running z/OS 1.7 with
Top Secret 9.0 but the problem goes back at least several years and
software levels.
Like many shops, we use
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Shane wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:19 -0500, O'Connor, Ruth wrote:
Any ideas about what could have happened to the initiator to
affect an
smf exit's WTOs?
Have a look at the subpool for any getmains.
I would take a look at logrec to see if there were
13 matches
Mail list logo
