I went and RTFMed (C/C++ Runtime Library Reference) since my memory
obviously needed refreshing; I found this note:
If you cannot use a PDSE member or HFS file, and your program contains
C++ code, or C code that is compiled with any of the RENT, LONGNAME, DLL or
IPA compiler options, you must
In a recent note, Robert Pelletier said:
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:01:56 -0400
Thanks for the quick response John. We don't use PDSE's either.
Should be fun. Have a good weekend all.
You should, then, consider the alternative big jump: HFS instead of
PDSE.
-Original
In a recent note, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc said:
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:48:03 +0200
Unfortunally the process for the internal compress is a bit hidden to me.
I had thought there is no compress. Space vacated by deleted members is
simply recycled for new members; existing
Paul Gilmartin writes
You should, then, consider the alternative big jump: HFS instead of PDSE.
This is good advice iff the C or C++ programs (functions) involved are to be
executed under
USS. It is very bad advice if they arre instead to be executed undrer MVS
(which I suspect to be
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
... PDSE implies SMS implies ...
IIRC, non-SMS-managed PDSE became generally available March 31, 2000
with OS/390 V2R9.
--
-
| Edward E. Jaffe||
| Mgr,
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 14:44:04 +
You should, then, consider the alternative big jump: HFS instead of PDSE.
This is good advice iff the C or C++ programs (functions) involved are to be
executed under
USS. It is very bad advice if they
In a recent note, Big Iron said:
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:02:37 -0500
There are also some binder options: COMPAT, CASE=MIXED, LONGNAME or DLL
which can force the use of program objects.
I couldn't resist trying this:
//DOIT EXEC HLASMCL,PARM.C=(OBJECT,NOXOBJECT,TERM),
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
... PDSE implies SMS implies ...
IIRC, non-SMS-managed PDSE became generally available March 31, 2000
with OS/390 V2R9.
True enough and at the same time non-SMS PDSE support was
retrofitted all the way back to OS/390 V2R5. But hardly
: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
In a recent note, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc said:
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:48:03 +0200
Unfortunally the process for the internal compress is a bit hidden to
me.
I had thought there is no compress. Space vacated by deleted members is simply
Hi All. I'm trying to save the compiled 'c' code to a loadlib and I'm getting
the following error in my jcl during the bind process:
IEW2606S 4B39 MODULE INCORPORATES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3 FEATURES AND CANNOT BE
SAVED IN LOAD MODULE FORMAT.
Would anyone no what is going on? This is the fisrt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
Hi All. I'm trying to save the compiled 'c' code to a loadlib
Hi All. I'm trying to save the compiled 'c' code to a loadlib and I'm
getting the following error in my jcl during the bind process: IEW2606S
4B39 MODULE INCORPORATES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 3 FEATURES AND CANNOT BE
SAVED IN LOAD MODULE FORMAT.
Your library needs to be a PDSE.
Bob Shannon
Thanks for the quick response John. We don't use PDSE's either. Should be fun.
Have a good weekend all.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
-Original
I was going to gently suggest to Bob that he RTFM, but I checked the 1.6
FM myself and find that the message description doesn't help much.
*IEW2606S* *MODULE* *INCORPORATES* feature_level *FEATURES* *AND* *CANNOT*
*BE* *SAVED* *IN*
format_level *FORMAT.*
*Explanation:* An attempt
Thanks Bruce and everyone. Really appreciate it again.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
I was going to gently suggest to Bob that he RTFM, but I
I think it means you must save into a PDSE as a program
object, instead of a PDS as a load module.
Anyone know for sure?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/3/2005 1:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
(the other permitted repository for program
objects).
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Robert Pelletier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
Thanks Bruce and everyone. Really appreciate
-
From: Robert Pelletier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEW2606S Doing C Programming
Thanks Bruce and everyone. Really appreciate it again.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
18 matches
Mail list logo
