Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Mark
Bob Wright wrote: Mark wrote: May I ask how one goes about getting those libraries? I believe that I'll be potentially looking at dumps from any z/OS system. This suggests that I'll need to find libraries for the all the various releases. Mark, if, as it sounds, you function as a

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Chuck Arney
or VSE with CMSACCess Voice: 972-296-6166 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module) Bob Wright wrote: Mark

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Mark wrote: Bob, we do function as a vendor for IBM OS390 and zOS based products. If anyone has contact information to get me started on this, I would certainly appreciate it. If you're a PWD member, talk to your TLC or other contact. Installing a copy of all the zOS releases just to get

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Imbriale, Donald (Exchange)
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module) The systems maintained by the IBM's DTSC in Dallas have all of the back-level IPCS stuff available going back to z/OS V1R3 (the oldest supported OS right now

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) wrote: z/OS V1R3 support was discontinued 31March2005. Right. What I should have said was that the z/OS V1R6 DTSC and ADCD systems have z/OS V1R3 IPCS elements because it was the oldest OS supported at the time those systems were built. --

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Mark
Edward E. Jaffe wrote: Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) wrote: z/OS V1R3 support was discontinued 31March2005. Right. What I should have said was that the z/OS V1R6 DTSC and ADCD systems have z/OS V1R3 IPCS elements because it was the oldest OS supported at the time those systems were

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-30 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Mark wrote: Its possible that I have the ADCD delivery. If the installer did the right job and did install the 1.3 thru 1.5 libraries, what names would I search for to find these back level libraries? I can search my system to see if I already have them. ADCD is disk volumes that are

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-29 Thread Mark
Jim Mulder wrote: OA10104 (PTF UA16888) should fix the 0C4 abend in the z/OS 1.6 VERBX VSMDATA. However, if you are processing a z/OS 1.4 dump on a z/OS 1.6 system. you should be STEPLIBing or TSOLIBing to a z/OS 1.4 SYS1.MIGLIB, as well as the z/OS 1.4 PARMLIB for IPCAPARM, etc. Jim

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-29 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/29/2005 10:38:11 AM: However, if you are processing a z/OS 1.4 dump on a z/OS 1.6 system. you should be STEPLIBing or TSOLIBing to a z/OS 1.4 SYS1.MIGLIB, as well as the z/OS 1.4 PARMLIB for IPCAPARM, etc. May I ask how one

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-29 Thread Bob Wright
Mark wrote: May I ask how one goes about getting those libraries? I believe that I'll be potentially looking at dumps from any z/OS system. This suggests that I'll need to find libraries for the all the various releases. Mark, if, as it sounds, you function as a vendor for z/OS

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-28 Thread Mark
Ed Finnell wrote: In a message dated 6/28/2005 6:56:15 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That might indicate a mismatch between your exit definitions and your MIGLIB. Are you using the new exit definitions from z/OS or did you carry the old definitions forward from

Re: IGVFSMAN 0C4 (was IPCS missing module)

2005-06-28 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/28/2005 10:18:52 AM: Ed Finnell wrote: In a message dated 6/28/2005 6:56:15 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That might indicate a mismatch between your exit definitions and your MIGLIB. Are you