a.edu
> Subject: CA doco - (was: Is RMF Better?)
>
> Thanks Jeff - I just took the opportunity to do so. Much better.
> I see a request for feedback on the Documantation page - I may just
> accomodate them.
>
> Shane ..
>
> On Tue, Mar 15th, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jeff Gross wro
Thanks Jeff - I just took the opportunity to do so. Much better.
I see a request for feedback on the Documantation page - I may just accomodate
them.
Shane ..
On Tue, Mar 15th, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Jeff Gross wrote:
> For the CA doc, all you have do is register with your Email and you can
> get acc
Shane,
For the CA doc, all you have do is register with your Email and you can get
access to the documentation. As for problem/fix info, yes, you still need a
customer site id.
Hope this helps a bit.
Jeff
--
For IBM-MAIN
One item was brought up at SHARE regarding CMF/RMF and z/OSMF. z/OSMF is the
new web-based system for system programmers. Depending on the release, it
provides problem determination, Communications Server migration, Workload
Manager policy editor, and a workload monitor. The workload monitor is
: Shane Ginnane
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 8:05:18 AM
Subject: Re: Is RMF Better?
Follow-up to my last post.
As an independent, it is useful to keep abreast of the product documentation
and problem database(s) for products I may be queried on.
Ever tried to do that for CA if
Follow-up to my last post.
As an independent, it is useful to keep abreast of the product documentation
and problem database(s) for products I may be queried on.
Ever tried to do that for CA if you don't have a customer number ?.
They have always been anal about that, and on just (re-)checking I s
Been many years since I have dealt with CMF - (at least) before z/OS I would
think.
Had some nice additions, but as an RMF user I had no issues adapting to it.
But I don't pay the software bills, I just do the grunt work.
As a free-lancer, I like to concentrate on the tools I'm most likely to find
I haven't ever used or even seen CMF, so I can't really comment on the
comparison. However, I will say that I really like RMF's Distributed
Dataserver component which exposes RMF III interval data as XML
that can then be used in all sorts of interesting ways. IBM's included
browser-based Data
Chip,
I don't know if such a document actually exists, but we just switched from CMF
to RMF last week. In our case the cost was significantly less for RMF. CMF
has a few more bells and whistles, but we weren't taking advantage of them.
RMF gives us what we need at a lower cost and at the end
We are currently a user of CMF and are happy with it. Looking at the BMC
website, there is a nice article about 20 reasons to use CMF. I'm wondering if
RMF has distinguested itself to the point I got bullets to justify the cost
increase? Is anyone aware of a "20 reason to use RMF" pdf?
10 matches
Mail list logo