PM
Subject: Re: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
The original post cited short on storage and max task limit as chronic
problems. Neither problem can be fixed by tweaking CPU controls. Before
committing to an LPAR solution, OP is advised to dig deeper into the
current problems
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
No knowing any better is probably me best anwer. I thought
we would
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
We've been having a bunch of problems CICS short on storage , max task
etc... and I posed the question can we create a LPAR specifically for our
CICS
regions and another for our batch. I don't know if it is even possible.
Does
modification would have to
be made to their code (some of the programs check applid).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jim McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: LPAR strictly for CICS
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:53:39 -0500, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
No knowing any better is probably me best anwer. I thought we would be
able to control resources better. However, using the CPU Critical may be an
option also. However, I think that we created a service class recently
for our
I'm pretty sure it is ESDA.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
We've been having a bunch of problems CICS short on storage , max task
etc... and I posed the question can we create a LPAR specifically for our CICS
regions and another for our batch. I don't know if it is even possible. Does
anyone currently do something like this? If so, how do you
I don't understand how a separate LPAR is going to make a difference? Are you
planning to change something else in the system configuration (ie CSA size, LPA
size) that will effect the private region?
If not, I see no advantage to another LPAR. It's more likely you need more
CICS regions.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of gsg
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
We've been having a bunch of problems CICS short on storage ,
max task
No knowing any better is probably me best anwer. I thought we would be
able to control resources better. However, using the CPU Critical may be an
option also. However, I think that we created a service class recently for
our
HOTBATCH service class. I don't think we would want to many
Wolpert
Performance and Capacity Planning consultant
WEBSITE: www.perfconsultant.com
- Original Message -
From: gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
No knowing any
ibm-m...@bama.ua Subject
.edu Re: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: LPAR strictly for CICS Onlines
The original post cited short on storage and max task limit as chronic
problems. Neither problem can be fixed by tweaking CPU
13 matches
Mail list logo
