Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-19 Thread Arthanarieswaran, Singar
76155 ( Phone:+1-817-355-5926) + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Singar Arthanarieswaran Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP We

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-09 Thread Frank Krueger
(Tersed or XMIT) . I did not have success with type u - still testing with this. I can transfer using RECFM U - but always have garbage after FTP. Frank Krueger Freitag, 9. Dezember 2005 17:32 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc: From: Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Mainfr

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Lou, Jim said: > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:49:26 -0500 > > This is not true. You can ftp type=u. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf Of Frank Krueger > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:18 PM >

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-09 Thread Lou, Jim
This is not true. You can ftp type=u. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Krueger Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP Cause it is variable you can

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said: > Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:29:52 -0500 > > >Some misconfigured 'black hole' > >routers will silently drop packets or otherwise garble the data. > > Wouldn't TCP catch such? > Most TCPs. Not necessarily IBM's. To be fair, they fix such

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/07/2005 at 03:16 PM, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >This almost sounds like a network issue. I'd guess that it's using stream mode instead of record mode. >Some misconfigured 'black hole' >routers will silently drop packets or otherwise garble the data.

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Natarajan Mohan
We transfer VB files across LPAR's using FTP without tersing the file. The following options works for us. TYPE E MODE B Thanks Nat -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Hal Merritt
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Krueger Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP Matthew i have tried to often and got errors when doing FTP from MVS to MVS with VBS or U files . I am doing a lot of Studies with SMF Data

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Hal Merritt
Of Hal Merritt Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP The FM suggests MODE E TYPE C. The FM also suggests that Binary (TYPE I) is not appropriate in this situation. Works for me. -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Frank Krueger
, then RECEIVE INDSN. As said - i prefer TRSMAIN - cause sometimes i have to handle 5 GB of TERSED SMF data which gives app. 40 GB SMF . Frank Krueger Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:33 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc: From: Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Singar Arthanarieswaran > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:59 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP > > > We are tryi

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Matthew Stitt
ey can but contain garbage. > >Frank Krueger > > >Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:09 >To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU >cc: >From: Singar Arthanarieswaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP > > > >We are trying to FTP a large file from mainfram

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Hal Merritt
PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file has lot of packed fields. We are using BINARY transfer. We have tried all the options including NOWRAPRECORD, RECFM, LRECL combinations, but the file is wrapping

Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Frank Krueger
ntain garbage. Frank Krueger Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:09 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc: From: Singar Arthanarieswaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file has lot of packed fields. We are using BINA

Mainframe to Mainframe FTP

2005-12-07 Thread Singar Arthanarieswaran
We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file has lot of packed fields. We are using BINARY transfer. We have tried all the options including NOWRAPRECORD, RECFM, LRECL combinations, but the file is wrapping the records on the destination. Please note the file is a Variabl