Richbourg, Claude wrote:
Good morning all,
I am pondering the difference, (Performance-Disaster Recovery-More/Less
volumes), for JES2 spool datasets.
We are at z/OS 1.7 in one dev LPAR and I am starting the
cloning/building process for our production LPAR.
We are a mid-size shop with
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
09/07/2006
at 08:59 AM, Richbourg, Claude
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Any and all would be appreciated.
Ensure that your D/R site can provide whatever volume sizes you use.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Good morning all,
I am pondering the difference, (Performance-Disaster Recovery-More/Less
volumes), for JES2 spool datasets.
We are at z/OS 1.7 in one dev LPAR and I am starting the
cloning/building process for our production LPAR.
We are a mid-size shop with (4) mod-3s used for JES2
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:59 -0400, Richbourg, Claude wrote:
Since I can take advantage of the 'Large Dataset Support' for JES2 now,
what are the pros/cons of having one mod-27 versus 2 mod'9s?
How busy are your spool volumes today, and do you have PAVs? I don't
have PAV, so I spread our I/O
, 2006 10:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mod-9 or Mod-27 for JES2 spool dataset(s).
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:59 -0400, Richbourg, Claude wrote:
Since I can take advantage of the 'Large Dataset Support' for JES2
now,
what are the pros/cons of having one mod-27 versus 2 mod'9s?
How busy
5 matches
Mail list logo