>I have a question about DAF. Have you ever made DAF so it uses less CPU
>time? I really like DAF, and found it a great help under certain
>circumstances. It just seemed that whenever I ran a DAF job, it buried
>the CPU while the job ran. This was at my last job, where we had an
> MP3000-H50,
Michael,
I have a question about DAF. Have you ever made DAF so it uses less CPU
time? I really like DAF, and found it a great help under certain
circumstances. It just seemed that whenever I ran a DAF job, it buried the
CPU while the job ran. This was at my last job, where we had an MP300
DumpMaster
//DMBENAN DD DUMMY
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New Level of Dataset Audit Facility (DAF) is Coming
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: New Level of Dataset Audit Facility (DAF) is Coming Soon
Michael Cleary wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This specific error has not been reported by anyone. Can you de
Michael Cleary wrote:
Greetings,
This specific error has not been reported by anyone. Can you describe the
circumstances when the abend occurs? Can you send me a zip attachment of
all of the execution output and we can go from there.
Also, adding the following to the execution JCL would be
Greetings,
I will correct the:
DAF613I 080 2007031 13.03.14.43 Unknown Datatype=x"24
If anyone else gets DAF613I messages, let me know so that I can correct
them.
Cheers...
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Greetings,
This specific error has not been reported by anyone. Can you describe the
circumstances when the abend occurs? Can you send me a zip attachment of
all of the execution output and we can go from there.
Also, adding the following to the execution JCL would be helpful (and
anything e
Greetings,
These are virtual SMF records created by DAF when it runs to look at
things on the system that do not currently have their own SMF records, but
from an auditing perspective should. It seems to provide the visibility
missing for system datasets that are not opened and closed by
jobs
could you fix the abend SC03 .. we get it fairly consistently at the
end... close before subtask termination? -- z/os 1.7 is the os
Dataset Audit Facility (DAF) - Level 1.4.7
292 SYSTEM COMPLETION
CODE=C03
292 TIME=09.08.22
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:04:04 -0800, Michael Cleary
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Add Virtual SMF Records
>001 001 - Virtual APFLST
>001 002 - Virtual LNKLST
>001 003 - Virtual LOADPARM
>001 004 - Virtual LPALST
>001 005 - Virtual Master Catalog
>001 006 - Virtual PAGE
>00
LBI support would be nice.
All our SMF tape archives are written
by DFSORT with blksize > 32K so before
I can run DAF the data has to be copied
back to DASD first. If DAF would support
LBI it would be much more convenient.
Thanks.
--
Jeff
Michael Cleary said the following on 02/16/2007 07:04 P
Greetings,
I am working to finalize another level of DAF.
Changes so far since DAF 1.4.7 include:
Add keyword DEVADDR
Add keyword DEVTYPE
Add SMF Record Type 21 support
Add SMF Record Type 90 Subtype 01 support
A
12 matches
Mail list logo
