Re: Nice article, high level - homegrown vs. vendor basically

2011-12-14 Thread Staller, Allan
Tim, Please expound and elucidate, oh wise and wonderful sage G snip Great Platform Shakeout of the Naughts /snip -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the

Re: Nice article, high level - homegrown vs. vendor basically

2011-12-14 Thread Timothy Sipples
Re: Great Platform Shakeout of the Naughts, I'm referring primarily to the struggles Sun and HP have had and are having, but you could include other examples, such as Silicon Graphics, which stopped producing its MIPS-based servers in 2006. The server market has ended up with two horses in my

Nice article, high level - homegrown vs. vendor basically

2011-12-13 Thread McKown, John
http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/homegrown-solutions-the-good-and-the-bad-181268 quote Once upon a time, when AS/400s roamed in vast herds and S/390s ruled the roost, just about all of IT was homegrown. Vendors didn't have solutions -- they had platforms, and you customized them to fit

Re: Nice article, high level - homegrown vs. vendor basically

2011-12-13 Thread Timothy Sipples
Packaged applications -- or whatever other term you'd like to use -- have been around and popular since at least the 1960s. Many/most portfolios of mainframe-hosted applications have always blended purchased applications and application components (purchased libraries and frameworks, as examples)