Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-06-03 Thread Mike
ah - concise and correct - thanks for the info! Now i know there is a BEA, and it can exist in the RTM2WA - unfortunately for this situation the BEA was basically the same as the R14 in the BASR 14,15 where the R15 was 0. But i'll add this acronym to my resume. On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:24 PM,

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-06-01 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 9:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: No SDWA - TEA Sometimes when I'm floundering around in a [z]Linux environment, I *really

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-30 Thread Peter Relson
I wrote In addition, the BEA at the time of the PER interrupt can be found in LCCABEA2. Oops. This was not a PER situation. For error events, the BEA is moved from the LCCA into the RT1W and/or the RTM2WA. If the error occurred in enabled unlocked task mode with no EUT FRRs, then there will

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-30 Thread Shane Ginnane
Sometimes when I'm floundering around in a [z]Linux environment, I *really* wish there was an analogue of IPCS. But that would require proprietary (OCO) code limitations I guess. In that world, I'll take the open source option and wear the frustrations of dump analysis (another thread in a

LCRASH - was: Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-30 Thread Barbara Nitz
Sometimes when I'm floundering around in a [z]Linux environment, I *really* wish there was an analogue of IPCS. But that would require proprietary (OCO) code limitations I guess. In that world, I'll take the open source option and wear the frustrations of dump analysis (another thread in a

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-30 Thread Barbara Nitz
I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 no SDWA - so no SDWABEA this is z/os 1.10 I note in the trace there is a TEA - in a S0C4 it is the offending page address, but what is the significance of this for a S0C1? As others have noted: for a slip dump for abend0c1,

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-29 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:27:00 -0400 Mike ospen...@gmail.com wrote: :I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 :no SDWA - so no SDWABEA :this is z/os 1.10 :I note in the trace there is a TEA - in a S0C4 it is the offending page :address, but what is the significance of

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-29 Thread Bob Rutledge
Mike wrote: I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 no SDWA - so no SDWABEA ip summ reg for;f rtm2wa;f bea Bob -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-29 Thread Peter Relson
SLIP supports symbolic BEAR. This appears to have been introduced in z/OS 1.7. Symbolics can be used in many of the SLIP keywords. In addition, the BEA at the time of the PER interrupt can be found in LCCABEA2. As posters have said, there is no TEI / TEA for a PIC 1. The field contains

No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-28 Thread Mike
I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 no SDWA - so no SDWABEA this is z/os 1.10 I note in the trace there is a TEA - in a S0C4 it is the offending page address, but what is the significance of this for a S0C1? Thanks Mike

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-28 Thread Bill Fairchild
: +1.508.341.1715 Email: bi...@mainstar.com Web: www.rocketsoftware.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 12:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: No SDWA - TEA I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-28 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 28 May 2010 13:27:00 -0400, Mike wrote: I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 no SDWA - so no SDWABEA Is there an RTM2WA for the S0C1? -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: No SDWA - TEA

2010-05-28 Thread Tony Harminc
On 28 May 2010 13:27, Mike ospen...@gmail.com wrote: I'm shooting a wild branch S0C1 dump - result of a SLIP SET,C=0C1 no SDWA   - so no SDWABEA this is z/os 1.10 I note in the trace there is a TEA - in a S0C4 it is the offending page address, but what is the significance of this for a