Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-10-01 Thread Dave Barry
$E is restart $T is reset Both take SRVCLASS as an operand. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Kopischke Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:06:31 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote: Is there any way to nullify the effect of the $E command after it has been issued? If so I could have AF/Operator issue the appropriate commands. I would probably use AF Oper to capture the $E command, and put out an ARE YOU SURE

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Ulrich Krueger
We have the same problem on occasion, but we generally see an operator enter E next to a running JOB in SDSF and hit enter. Nothing happens initially, but as soon as the JOB ends, it restarts itself. Most of our JOBs do BR14s at the start to ensure the files it creates aren't already there. So

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:15:00 -0700, Ulrich Krueger wrote: We have the same problem on occasion, but we generally see an operator enter E next to a running JOB in SDSF and hit enter. Nothing happens initially, but as soon as the JOB ends, it restarts itself. Most of our JOBs do BR14s at the start

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Bob Rutledge
Dave Kopischke wrote: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:15:00 -0700, Ulrich Krueger wrote: How about restricting the use of the E command in that operator's SDSF profile? It's also used to change service classes. E does no such thing. Bob

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Ted MacNEIL
It's also used to change service classes. E does no such thing. Are we talking about E or $E? E jobname,SRVCLASS= Does exactly that. Prior to Goal Mode, there was a PERFORM=nn - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota!

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Bob Rutledge
Ted MacNEIL wrote: It's also used to change service classes. E does no such thing. Are we talking about E or $E? We are talking about SDSF action characters. Bob -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Ted MacNEIL
E does no such thing. Are we talking about E or $E? We are talking about SDSF action characters. Well that was informative! I usually overtype the service class, so I have NO idea what your response meant! - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota!

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-30 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:59:53 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote: Ted MacNEIL wrote: It's also used to change service classes. E does no such thing. Are we talking about E or $E? We are talking about SDSF action characters. I believe line command E in SDSF is translated to $E. The E in MVS is the

Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-29 Thread Grinsell, Don
Cross posted to CICS-L and IBM-Main We have an occasional problem where an operator inadvertently issues the JES $E restart command against one of our CICS regions. The effect of the $E command is deferred until the current job step ends...typically with the weekly restart. The problem is

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-29 Thread Lizette Koehler
We have an occasional problem where an operator inadvertently issues the JES $E restart command against one of our CICS regions. The effect of the $E command is deferred until the current job step ends...typically with the weekly restart. The problem is that the job never really ends,

Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command

2010-09-29 Thread Grinsell, Don
make stupid mistakes. Only very, very clever ones. -- Doctor Who -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2010 10:07 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Nullify Effect of $EJ command