In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca343c2f...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 06/28/2010
at 06:27 PM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com said:
How many relatives did he have and does he still have? Tens of
billions. Is the number increasing exponentially? Yes.
No. It's quenched exponential
In 4c28652f.9090...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 06/28/2010
at 11:02 AM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
BTW: A programmer I know, used to put time bombs into program. The
bombs were deleted after he got money for his job. He considered it
as some kind of insurance. Is it unethical? Yes,
:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: O/Topic Selling poisoned software
In
77142d37c0c3c34da0d7b1da7d7ca343c2f...@nwt-s-mbx1.rocketsoftware.com,
on 06/28/2010
at 06:27 PM, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com said:
How many relatives did he have and does he still have? Tens of
billions
Statistical remarkability, in this case, depends on the precise definition
of relative, and no precision was given in the original reference to
Machiavelli.
How many relatives did he have and does he still have? Tens of billions.
Is the number increasing exponentially? Yes. There will be
Taken to extremes YOU are probably a relative (FSVO relative)
-Original Message-
George Henke
Statistical remarkability, in this case, depends on the precise
definition of relative, and no precision was given in the original
reference to Machiavelli.
How many relatives did he have and
Rick Fochtman pisze:
[...]
Disabling your own software after a certain date is one thing;
unpleasant but not unheard of. Disabling the whole shop is HIGHLY
UNETHICAL and should be condemned with all possible vigor.
Unethical - sure. Unlawful? Not necessarily. And can be hard to prove.
BTW: A
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
Rick Fochtman pisze:
Disabling your own software after a certain date is one thing; unpleasant
but not unheard of. Disabling the whole shop is HIGHLY UNETHICAL and should
be condemned with all possible vigor.
Unethical - sure. Unlawful? Not necessarily. And can be
Selling poisoned software
Rick Fochtman pisze:
Disabling your own software after a certain date is one thing;
unpleasant
but not unheard of. Disabling the whole shop is HIGHLY UNETHICAL and
should be condemned with all possible vigor.
Unethical - sure. Unlawful? Not necessarily. And can
In a message dated 6/28/2010 8:37:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
dennis.ro...@lmco.com writes:
in a parmlib or lmod. It is a well defined and accepted practice, so long
as it is stated upfront.
Back when it was MIX, they'd fall on some relative of Machiavelli's
birthday! Sinister
In a message dated 6/28/2010 9:50:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
paulgboul...@aim.com writes:
Perhaps this is statistically unremarkable. How many relatives
does Machiavelli have? Is the number increasing exponentially?
Google's pretty good at these types rhetorical discourses.
“No
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:04:12 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
Back when it was MIX, they'd fall on some relative of Machiavelli's
birthday! Sinister
Perhaps this is statistically unremarkable. How many relatives
does Machiavelli have? Is the number increasing exponentially?
-- gil
This post is trivial enough to require posting on a Friday, but it points out
the meaninglessness of anything that is not defined precisely enough.
We don't need to use Google to figure this out. If we had perfect
documentation, I think everyone on earth today could be shown to be a relative
In a message dated 6/28/2010 1:28:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
bi...@mainstar.com writes:
I think the poster meant MICS, and not MIX. I don't remember any MIX
product.
MIX was real. Precursor to MIM, Allen Systems. Enabled us to do stuff
with multiprocessors that GRS couldn't
MIX was real. Precursor to MIM,
Allen Systems. Enabled us to do stuff with multiprocessors that GRS couldn't
handle.
I thought it was MSX/MSI.
I don't remember MIX, but I have been wrong before.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Ed Finnell of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 06/28/2010 01:59:23 PM:
In a message dated 6/28/2010 1:28:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
bi...@mainstar.com writes:
I think the poster meant MICS, and not MIX. I don't remember any MIX
product.
MIX was
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:02:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes:
don't remember MIX, but I have been wrong before
No, you're correct. The gutter folks have me a little flummoxed.
--
For
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:05:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jkali...@csc.com writes:
We used to run Super-MSI (Multiple Systems Integrity) from Allen Systems
Group, circa 1980.
Yep. MSI MSX. There was a competitor from maybe Duquense but it always
lost the benchmarks.
---snip
PS: no unethical persons were harmed while writing this post... ;-D
--unsnip---
Why not?? :-)
Rick
Yep. MSI MSX. There was a competitor from maybe Duquense but it always
lost the benchmarks.
SDSI, which I have also worked with.
But, I thought, and I could be wrong, that Duquense, became a company after
Moreno merged with the provider of SDSI.
1985?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:38:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes:
But, I thought, and I could be wrong, that Duquense, became a company
after Moreno merged with the provider of SDSI.
Definitely foggy about the whole thing. We had MSX and MICS and were doing
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 06/28/2010
03:38:32 PM:
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 06/28/2010 03:38 PM
Subject: Re: O/Topic Selling poisoned software
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Yep. MSI
Arrested the managers of a company that sold 'software' poisoned 1,000
companiesFraudsters introduced errors controlled for the system to fail at a
particular dateDUVA JESUS - Madrid - 22/06/2010VoteResult 147
votes The Guardia Civil have arrested three managers of a company that sells
22 matches
Mail list logo
