Re: Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers)

2008-04-17 Thread Edward Jaffe
Mark Zelden wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:04:00 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PARMLIB is similar to LNKLST in concept. It is a concatenation of libraries, specified via PARMLIB statements in the LOADxx member of IPLPARM, and accessed via the IEFPRMLB service. Similar

Re: Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers)

2008-04-17 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:04:00 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark Zelden wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so "secret" >>> about the contents of parmlib. IMHO

Re: Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers)

2008-04-17 Thread Wayne Driscoll
half Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers) Mark Zelden wrote: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Sheesh! I&#

Re: Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers)

2008-04-17 Thread Edward Jaffe
Mark Zelden wrote: On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so "secret" about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discu

Parmlib Paranoia (was Re: Workable Mainframe Debuggers)

2008-04-16 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:12:56 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Sheesh! I've never understood what some sysprog's think is so "secret" >about the contents of parmlib. IMHO, UACC(NONE) for parmlib is more >draconian paranoia than anything else. But, that's a discussion for >another thr