frame Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Portmap start task
All,
Has anybody run into an issue with the portmap started
task
running in a default service class rather than sysstc like tcpip? We use
STK (SUN) HSC and libstation and have had some odd thing
Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Portmap start task
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EM
309-683-7452
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Portmap start task
I don't think the problem is in Libstation. I think
ent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/25/2008 03:35 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Portmap start task
Pat,
What's weird is that we have a NonStop (Tandem) and a
Siemens
PACS system that get their mounts th
ssion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pat Mihalec
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Portmap start task
We have been running it at stcmed, but still have the problem of Vertias
loosing the connection sometimes. The resolution is to stop/
]
"Leitner, Timothy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/25/2008 03:05 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Portmap start task
Portmap runs in class stclo - discretionary. I just changed it to stcm
] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Portmap start task
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leitner, Timothy
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:43
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Pinion
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:32 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Portmap start task
>
>
> I'm sorry but I can't r
I'm sorry but I can't resist. You might be a redneck if you call your service
names "bubba"!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Portmap start task
Date:
02:27 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Portmap start task
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leitner, Timothy
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:43 P
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leitner, Timothy
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 1:43 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Portmap start task
>
>
> All,
> Has anybody run
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:42:48 -0600, Leitner, Timothy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All,
> Has anybody run into an issue with the portmap started task
>running in a default service class rather than sysstc like tcpip? We use
>STK (SUN) HSC and libstation and have had some odd things happening w
t;
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/25/2008 01:42 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Portmap start task
All,
Has anybody run into an issue with the portmap started
task
running in a default service class ra
All,
Has anybody run into an issue with the portmap started task
running in a default service class rather than sysstc like tcpip? We use
STK (SUN) HSC and libstation and have had some odd things happening with
our Veritas system. We have found that there will be a number (20-30)
connectio
14 matches
Mail list logo
