Re: Processor model in HCD

2008-12-02 Thread Martin Packer
I can't talk about HCD but I would observe that moving from a S28 to a S38 is just about sticking the third book in. It says nothing whatsoever about adding CHARACTERISED / PURCHASED engines or changes in capacity. By the way RMF now has the hardware model (eg S38) in Type 70. I asked for it

Processor model in HCD

2008-12-01 Thread Mursel Tasgin
Hi, We plan to upgrade our 2094 S28 machine to S38 (via adding book on the same box). We try to figure out what changes will occur in our definitions, parameters etc. Other than some software licences(ie: # of CPUs), the only  place we have coded S28 is HCD's Processors section. Since the

Re: Processor model in HCD

2008-12-01 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Since the processor model doesn't change (it is still 2094), do we need to define our processors as S38 in HCD? Does this definition have any effect on CPU's hw definition or performance?  Has anyone experienced the same situation?  IIRC, any processor 'definitions' are just comments. You get