Re: WLM classification for separate tn3270 server?

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Jacobs
Chase, John wrote: Hi, All, In preparation for z/OS 1.9 (currently on 1.7), we're fledging the tn3270 server from the TCPIP nest to its own address space. TCPIP currently runs in SYSSTC. Would that also be appropriate for the new TN3270 address space? Any difference in importance or

Re: WLM classification for separate tn3270 server?

2008-04-24 Thread Patrick Falcone
Yes, no difference in importance or goal since SYSSTC is *hardwired* at FE which is where TCPIP lives. Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, All, In preparation for z/OS 1.9 (currently on 1.7), we're fledging the tn3270 server from the TCPIP nest to its own address space. TCPIP currently

Re: WLM classification for separate tn3270 server?

2008-04-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
TCPIP currently runs in SYSSTC. Would that also be appropriate for the new TN3270 address space? I would recommend leaving it there. Since it's a 'server' address space, it should be higher than every sub-system that 'uses' it. - Too busy driving to stop for gas!

Re: WLM classification for separate tn3270 server?

2008-04-24 Thread John Hamman
This is how our's is set up TN3270 TN3270 TN3270 NSW SO A=00BA PER=NO SMC=000 PGN=N/A DMN=N/A AFF=NONE CT=043.425S ET=80.07.21 WUID=STC00267 USERID=TCP

Re: WLM classification for separate tn3270 server?

2008-04-24 Thread Steven Conway
What Mark Jacobs and Mark Hamman said? Yeah, us too. TN3270 TN3270 TN3270 NSW SO A=0063 PER=NO SMC=000 PGN=N/A DMN=N/A AFF=NONE CT=077.101S ET=73.56.59 WUID=STC04097