Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-06 Thread SrinivasG
Thanks to all for the help. The Disk issue is resolved now. Regards, Srinivas G -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rowe Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 8:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Z10 BC DS8700

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-04 Thread SrinivasG
Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rowe Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 8:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue To explain further: The CUADD in the CNTLUNIT statement in the IOCDS corresponds to the DS8K

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-03 Thread Paolo Cacciari
Srnivas, double check DS8700 Channel Paths and be sure they're ONLINE... If they are, check your IOCDS and verify that CHPs/CUs are assigned to your LPAR (if you are IPLing one...). Ciao. _ Paolo Cacciari IBM Italia

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-03 Thread SrinivasG
up before the Z10BC? Regards, Srinivas G -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paolo Cacciari Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue Srnivas, double check

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-03 Thread Paolo Cacciari
Srinivas, about power sequence: DS8700 must be up and running before you can use it That's obvious... Anyway, try to vary DS8700 CHPIDS off and on again and retry If the problem persist, maybe we need more elements to analyze it, like msgs, IOCDS infos and so on. Ciao.

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-03 Thread Scott Rowe
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paolo Cacciari Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:44 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue Srnivas, double check DS8700 Channel Paths and be sure they're ONLINE... If they are, check your IOCDS

Re: Z10 BC DS8700 Storage issue

2010-12-03 Thread Scott Rowe
To explain further: The CUADD in the CNTLUNIT statement in the IOCDS corresponds to the DS8K LCU under which the device was defined, and the UNITADD corresponds to the relative unit number within that LCU. If your storage guy says he created a volume at 2100, then that most likely means LCU 21,