It's not the possible problem of the real storage occupancy (conceivably
in the future driving paging or some other problem) that should be the
reason for investigation. Instead, it should be whether there is an
application problem (such as a virtual storage leak). If you feel
comfortable
Ted,
I am worried about if the real storage used more and more it will cause paging
issue..is it right ? thanks.
Wang Xiaobing.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:16:04 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
I find the problem is only real storage is increasing, virtual storage looks
ok..can not
Xiaobing wang...@bayss.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:14:35
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Real Storage Occupancy
Ted,
I am worried about if the real storage used
Let me ask an obvious question has the monitoring program been checked
to ensure that it isn't collecting the data or storing it improperly
(thereby accumulating data)?
Many performance monitors will allow you to see the data that is contained
in the allocated storage, so if you are seeing
Thanks, TED and Kees..
The system is no paging..but I would like to know the reason.
The Virtual Storage usage of the task - JCSOL is no increasing during the
days..
Do you think it is normal ? thanks.
Wang Xiaobing
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:59:45 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:54:44 -0500, Dale R. Smith dale-
sm...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:22:24 -0500, Wang Xiaobing
wang...@bayss.com wrote:
Hi,
We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it
is a long
term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we
Virtual storage used by the task won't increase unless new GETMAIN is issued.
After initial GETMAIN the working set will increase as the task begins
to access more pages without FREEMAIN.
These days, as real storage is usually not a problem, it's possible
that those pages will reside in central
It's difficult to find the reason from the program logic...:-(
Wang Xiaobing
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 23:15:04 +0800, Johnny Luo
johnny.xingkui@gmail.com wrote:
Virtual storage used by the task won't increase unless new GETMAIN is
issued.
After initial GETMAIN the working set will increase as
: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Wang Xiaobing wang...@bayss.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:59:45
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Real Storage Occupancy
Thanks
I find the problem is only real storage is increasing, virtual storage looks
ok..can not understand why..
As I've tried to tell, this NOT a problem.
Virtual storage is stable.
There is no paging issue.
So, what's the problem?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote in message
news:1461128744-1309404933-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-197
9920784-@b12.c1.bise6.blackberry...
The name is JCSOL, but we found the REAL
STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per day.
Can someone provide any
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:22:24 -0500, Wang Xiaobing
wang...@bayss.com wrote:
Hi,
We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it
is a long
term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we found the
REAL
STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per
day.
Hi,
We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it is a long
term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we found the REAL
STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per day.
Can someone provide any train of thought to investigate this problem? TIA.
The name is JCSOL, but we found the REAL
STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per day.
Can someone provide any train of thought to investigate this problem? TIA.
Is it a problem?
Are you paging?
Occupancy varies depending on the workload mix.
The SRM has a concept
: Real Storage Occupancy
Hi,
We use a rexx program invoking ISFAFD to monitor the BATCH JOB, it is a long
term running address space. The name is JCSOL, but we found the REAL
STORAGE occupied by JCSOL is increased, almost 6000 frames per day.
Can someone provide any train of thought
15 matches
Mail list logo
