Re: SMF SYNCVAL

2009-09-22 Thread Jeffery Swagger
Thank you Mr. Rutledge. I've updated SMFPRMxx to your suggestion. SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,20,34,35,40,99), EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFACTRT,IEFUJV,IEFUSI, IEFUJP,IEFUSO,IEFUJI,IEFUTL,IEFU29,IEFUAV), INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC),DETAIL) -- Jeff Bob Rutledge said the following on 9/22/2009 5:32 P

Re: SMF SYNCVAL

2009-09-22 Thread Jeffery Swagger
M: On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500, Frank Felitti wrote: I was having a problem whereby the last daily SMF interval was being recorded as part of the next day's set of intervals. IBM recommended setting the SMF SYNCVAL parameter to SYNCVAL(59) . I did this and it appeared to correct my pr

Re: SMF SYNCVAL

2009-09-22 Thread Bob Rutledge
Jeffery Swagger wrote: I'm having the same problem as the OP and the solution of SYNCVAL(59) is not working for me. In SMFPRMxx I have: INTVAL(10) SYNCVAL(59) <== Was 00 STATUS(SMF,SYNC) In ERBRMF00 I have SYNC(SMF) This only applies to the SMF type 23 records. You need INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC) to

Re: SMF SYNCVAL

2009-09-22 Thread Jeffery Swagger
I'm having the same problem as the OP and the solution of SYNCVAL(59) is not working for me. In SMFPRMxx I have: INTVAL(10) SYNCVAL(59) <== Was 00 STATUS(SMF,SYNC) In ERBRMF00 I have SYNC(SMF) This is z/OS 1.8 on z/890 Yesterday, 9/21, around 12:15 PM I did T SMF=xx to change the SYNCVAL from 0