Thank you Mr. Rutledge. I've updated SMFPRMxx to your suggestion.
SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,20,34,35,40,99),
EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFACTRT,IEFUJV,IEFUSI,
IEFUJP,IEFUSO,IEFUJI,IEFUTL,IEFU29,IEFUAV),
INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC),DETAIL)
--
Jeff
Bob Rutledge said the following on 9/22/2009 5:32 P
M:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:02:08 -0500, Frank Felitti
wrote:
I was having a problem whereby the last daily SMF interval was being
recorded as part of the next day's set of intervals. IBM recommended
setting the SMF SYNCVAL parameter to SYNCVAL(59) . I did this and it
appeared to correct my pr
Jeffery Swagger wrote:
I'm having the same problem as the OP and the
solution of SYNCVAL(59) is not working for me.
In SMFPRMxx I have:
INTVAL(10)
SYNCVAL(59) <== Was 00
STATUS(SMF,SYNC)
In ERBRMF00 I have
SYNC(SMF)
This only applies to the SMF type 23 records. You need INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC) to
I'm having the same problem as the OP and the
solution of SYNCVAL(59) is not working for me.
In SMFPRMxx I have:
INTVAL(10)
SYNCVAL(59) <== Was 00
STATUS(SMF,SYNC)
In ERBRMF00 I have
SYNC(SMF)
This is z/OS 1.8 on z/890
Yesterday, 9/21, around 12:15 PM I did T SMF=xx
to change the SYNCVAL from 0
4 matches
Mail list logo