Re: SMP/E HOLDs: ACTION vs. IPL

2008-01-16 Thread Marna WALLE
Bruce, Not at all. In fact, that is part of the appropriate education that will be taking place with RMF. -Marna WALLE z/OS System Build and Install IBM Poughkeepsie -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: SMP/E HOLDs: ACTION vs. IPL

2008-01-14 Thread Marna WALLE
Chip Kawalski, Level 3 Service Specialist, IBM Poughkeepsie responds: After some discussion with the teams owning the APARs/PTFs that you pointed out, here's some additional information on what happened and what's being done to correct things: OA19565.UA34181: A number of years ago, we had

Re: SMP/E HOLDs: ACTION vs. IPL

2008-01-14 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello Marna, I take it that from your comments re: RMF that you are advocating performing SMPE APPLY processing to update datasets in use by the current/active system. Regards Bruce Hewson -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

SMP/E HOLDs: ACTION vs. IPL

2008-01-07 Thread Mark Zelden
Looks like some SMP/E HOLDDATA reason education still needed within IBM... but things are much better than they used to be. The 2nd and 3rd one should have a REASON(DEP) also or a REQ for the 3rd one (VTAM and TCPIP are the 2 FMIDs involved). 4th should be reason RESTART. ++ HOLD(UA34181) SYS