In snt113-w448cf179d1c73c7d7782f8c6...@phx.gbl, on 08/24/2011
at 01:42 AM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com said:
His other comments were once correct
Still correct. The original message used the term linked rather than
bound, which at least hints that the LE was intended.
but are now
: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 8:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SYNCH[X] vs LINKX]
Seymour's most recent comments in this thread are not up to his usual
standard. He is quote right that a [loaded] in-storage module having a use
count of 0 will be used. His other comments were once correct
OK, I'm going to be the complainer now. I don't know if it is official, but
whenever I see LE, I think Language Environment, not Linkage Editor. Please
don't use LE for anything else. Or I'll just start using USS again for UNIX
System Services. grin
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00afc0ed...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/24/2011
at 12:44 PM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
OK, I'm going to be the complainer now. I don't know if it is
official, but whenever I see LE, I think Language Environment, not
Linkage Editor.
In 044b01cc6284$05c7ff60$1157fe20$@us, on 08/24/2011
at 12:34 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
With a few exceptions .. both, the linkage editor and the binder are
essentially the same
The Devil is in the details. The Binder does not permit all of the
combinations of
Seymour's most recent comments in this thread are not up to his usual standard.
He is quote right that a [loaded] in-storage module having a use count of 0
will be used. His other comments were once correct but are now obsolete,
except for those who continue to use the old linkage editor
6 matches
Mail list logo
