In 003901ca8bd0$35157ea0$9f407b...@org, on 01/02/2010
at 09:22 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
New decade; time for a new signature.
Yes, and as soon as Congress changes the law I will change my sig to match
:-(
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
In 003901ca8bd0$35157ea0$9f407b...@org, on 01/02/2010
at 09:22 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
New decade; time for a new signature.
Yes, and as soon as Congress changes the
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:45:42 -0800, David Alcock wrote:
Every year I hope in vain that he changes his email signature...
Ted's is much worse, IMO.
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
New decade; time for a new signature.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of David Alcock
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Seymour's signature
Every year I hope in vain that he
In a message dated 1/2/2010 11:50:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
New decade; time for a new signature
So, if the new decade really starts on 1 Jan 2011 he's got another year?
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 10:48, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 1/2/2010 11:50:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
charl...@mcn.org writes:
New decade; time for a new signature
So, if the new decade really starts on 1 Jan 2011 he's got another year?
Decade is just a
Every year I hope in vain that he changes his email signature but looks like
yet another year of posts with Eat your spam act of 2003. ;-)
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We don't have to
7 matches
Mail list logo
