On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:22:23 -0400, Clark, Kevin
kevin.cl...@bcbsde.com wrote:
Neal,
What TLS are you using TLS-128 or TLS 256?
I believe once you go over 128; the overhead is significant without a
Crypto processor.
How can I tell. I don't see anything in the FTP parms. We are running z/OS
I apologize if you've already addressed this, but it seems to me that the
first question to address is whether the problem is an FTP client issue, an
FTP server issue, or a network problem.
How are you comparing FTPS to FTP? (what kind of connection?). I would
suggest that you might first want
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
09/25/2009 10:36 AM
Subject:
Re: Slow FTPS thruput
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:22:23 -0400, Clark, Kevin
kevin.cl...@bcbsde.com wrote:
Neal,
What TLS are you using TLS-128 or TLS 256?
I believe once you go over 128
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:36:21 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
...
How can I tell. I don't see anything in the FTP parms. We are
running z/OS 1.4 BTW.
I don't know when GSKSRVR came into existance, but if it is in
1.4, issue the command
F GSKSRVR,DISPLAY CRYPTO
It
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:26:02 -0400, John Kelly
john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov wrote:
I thought that I remember that you had to be at 1.7 before FTPS, or maybe
it was sftp, would use the urandom dev. Don't know if that's an issue. But
haven't seen if you have a crypto nor if it's enabled.
Oh, it
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:16:35 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
...
on the z9 that we just installed. Do I need to be running ICSF for
this assist to work?
ICSF is needed to access a crypto coprocessor. It is not needed to
access crypto assist (if crypto assist means CPACF
We are implementing FTPS, and noticed a breath-taking increase in the time it
takes to transfer a file. A 20 megabyte file takes about 9 seconds to transfer
without TLS and about 160 seconds with TLS. The transfer rates are about
130 kbytes/sec with TLS and almost 2000 Kbytes/sec without.
Are
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:19:14 -0500, Neal Eckhardt
neckha...@penntraffic.com wrote:
... A 20 megabyte file takes about 9 seconds to transfer
without TLS and about 160 seconds with TLS. The transfer rates
are about 130 kbytes/sec with TLS and almost 2000 Kbytes/sec
without.
Are there any
3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Slow FTPS thruput
We are implementing FTPS, and noticed a breath-taking increase in the
time it
takes to transfer a file. A 20 megabyte file takes about 9 seconds to
transfer
without TLS and about 160 seconds with TLS. The transfer rates are about
130
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Slow FTPS thruput
We are implementing FTPS, and noticed a breath-taking increase in the time it
takes to transfer a file. A 20 megabyte file takes about 9 seconds to transfer
without TLS and about 160 seconds with TLS. The transfer rates are about
130 kbytes/sec with TLS
10 matches
Mail list logo
