Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-10 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:55:01 -0500, Brian Westerman brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com wrote: Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many more. Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET Brian

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-10 Thread Mark Pace
I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located? On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote: There is VTAMAPPL. We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc. Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands. Also used to automate

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-10 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
I'll have to search my LINKLIST, when we ran a FLEX it came from the ADCD libs. I'll get back unless other posters know the origin. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote: I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL.  Where is this program located? On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:08

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-10 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:32:02 -0400, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote: I can't seem to find VTAMAPPL. Where is this program located? That is an ADCD program.I have something on my web site and CBT file 434 called ACBCHECK. It's not the same as VTAMAPPL, but can serve a similar purpose.

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread George Rodriguez
For Five Consecutive Years - Original Message - From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tue Sep 08 22:30:35 2009 Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL At 14:13 -0500 on 09/08/2009, Mark Zelden wrote about Re

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:35 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com wrote: My question is why waste the time/effort to go to from v1.4 to v1.7 only to get one year of support when going to v1.8 would seem to be the same time/effort and would result in a number of years of support. It is

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Walter Marguccio
- Original Message From: George Rodriguez rodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us The only problem with this method is that I sometimes need a wait between commands... Is there anyone else using this method? If not, are you willing to share whatever you use? For startup, as well as shutdown,

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip--- There is VTAMAPPL. We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc. Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands. Also used to automate shutdown.

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread George Rodriguez
of All STCs After IPL -snip--- There is VTAMAPPL. We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc. Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands. Also used to automate shutdown. --unsnip

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Howard Rifkind
...@zurichna.com wrote: From: Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 9:42 AM On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:30:35 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com wrote: My question is why waste

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-09 Thread Brian Westerman
Sorry for the blatant plug, but there also is SyzCmdZ which contains all of the features of each of the command scripting products mentioned and many more. Info at WWW.SyzygyInc.NET Brian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread John Kelly
snip Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and here's it content: unsnip If you're 1.9+, the System REXX (AXR) might do it too. Jack Kelly 202-502-2390 (Office)

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:03:10 -0400, George Rodriguez rodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us wrote: Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and here's it content: snip The only problem with this method is that

Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread George Rodriguez
Hi Listeners, Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and here's it content: //IVPRDR PROC CLASS='X', DEFAULT SYSOUT CLASS IS A // M=DUMMY DEFAULT

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Myers, Edouard (OCTO)
: Startup of All STCs After IPL Hi Listeners, Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the start command for the STCs. The PROC was originally from IPO1.PROCLIB and here's it content: //IVPRDR PROC CLASS='X', DEFAULT SYSOUT CLASS IS A // M=DUMMY

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
George Rodriguez wrote: Nope..On v1.7...Working on 1.9... Did you purchase the z/OS 1.7 Lifecycle Extension? Or are you simply running unsupported? If the latter, why limit your upgrade to within the supported three-year migration window? BTW, I'm not judging. I'm just asking... --

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread George Rodriguez
) Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL We use a product called ALEXCMD and I think it's on the share tape, It allows waits and also responds to messages. Edouard A. Myers Senior Information Technology Specialist Office

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread George Rodriguez
District For Five Consecutive Years -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of John Kelly Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 12:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL snip Presently we use

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread George Rodriguez
List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL George Rodriguez wrote: Nope..On v1.7...Working on 1.9... Did you purchase the z/OS 1.7 Lifecycle Extension? Or are you

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Natarajan Mohan
George, Out of curiosity, what was the version of ADABAS/NATURAL you were running when faced with issues? and what version did you roll back to? Natarajan George Rodriguez rodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us 9/8/2009 11:15 AM Hi Edward, The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
George Rodriguez wrote: The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be done by application support. There was a great deal of changes that were needed to go to v1.7 and to eliminate a double billing

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Edward Jaffe
Edward Jaffe wrote: I'm just concerned that you're spending valuable time upgrading from an unsupported release to a release that becomes unsupported exactly three weeks from tomorrow... Mea Culpa! I mis-read the chart. You still have another year! Sorry... :-[ -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix

RES: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Mainframe Discussion List |[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] Em nome de John Kelly |Enviada em: terça-feira, 8 de setembro de 2009 13:49 |Para: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu |Assunto: Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL | |snip |Presently we use the following procedure (IVPRDR) to issue the |start command for the STCs

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread George Rodriguez
of All STCs After IPL George Rodriguez wrote: The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be done by application support. There was a great deal of changes that were needed to go to v1.7

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:35:28 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote: George Rodriguez wrote: The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system work that was required, but because of the testing that needed to be done by application support. There was a great

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 14:13 -0500 on 09/08/2009, Mark Zelden wrote about Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:35:28 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote: George Rodriguez wrote: The truth is that we just got off of v1.4... Not because of the system work that was required

Re: Startup of All STCs After IPL

2009-09-08 Thread Wayne Bickerdike
There is VTAMAPPL. We use that, it has PAUSE nn etc. Use it to start all our STCs and put appropriate PAUSEs in the commands. Also used to automate shutdown. On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:03 AM, George Rodriguezrodrigu...@palmbeach.k12.fl.us wrote: Hi Listeners, Presently we use the following