In early DEC 2007 IBM announced that they would accept SCRT reports
via email. You can submit in HOLD status, which requires that someone
log in to the web site and finish the process, or you can submit it "for real."
By submitting the report in HOLD status the data is now at the IBM site,
so any
een great without exception. A
gold star to the group!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Birger Heede
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Al,
SCRT User Guide Chapter
al process.
I must add: working with those folks has been great without exception. A
gold star to the group!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Birger Heede
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
Al,
SCRT User Guide Chapter 10 describes this way of submitting SCRT Reports.
If the SCRT Report for one reson or another does not go straight thru
the process then the Web interface must be used to submit the report
(with whatever corrects, comments, justifications needed).
A report in 'work i
There has been a 'request' in to IBM for some time related to this
automation/oops/ no automation topic.
The request is: allow sites to FTP or email the reports to IBM. IBM would
then stage your reports for your comments "as-if" you had used the web
interface. That is, they would get ready for yo
What's the address ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
>We FTP our SCRT reports to IBM and they have no problem w
>We FTP our SCRT reports to IBM and they have no problem with this approach.
Do you review them, first?
Because IBM doesn't.
They just blindly bill.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch
Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond Noal
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 7:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
We FTP our SCRT reports to IBM and they have no problem with this approach.
HTH
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior
AMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
>Directly sending the SCRT reports to IBM without a review has some risk
>associated with it.
I agree 100%.
I was sending SCRT reports to an ISV that used them.
But, I always reviewed them before they went.
I also attached the CSV to an XL spreads
>Directly sending the SCRT reports to IBM without a review has some risk
>associated with it.
I agree 100%.
I was sending SCRT reports to an ISV that used them.
But, I always reviewed them before they went.
I also attached the CSV to an XL spreadsheet, so I could plot and compare
month-to-month.
Directly sending the SCRT reports to IBM without a review has some risk
associated with it. The SCRT report will result in an IBM calculating your
software invoice for hundreds of thousands or even 1M+ dollars per month (or
whatever your currency is). I recommend you examine the report for a number
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:08:47 -0500, Dean Montevago wrote:
>Yes, I use this regulary. Can SMTP handle files other than 80 bytes ?
Yes, I send my SCRT reports to an IBM E-Mail address. The .CSV file is
variable blocked, so my E-Mail headers and trailer has to be VB for GENER.
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Yes, I use this regulary. Can SMTP handle files other than 80 bytes ?
Still haven't gone to the link you sent.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gary Green
Sent: Friday, January 11,
A.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
This is how I send files in a batch job...
//MAILFILE PROC SOUT='*',
// DS='???&#
lf Of Gary Green
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
A follow-up...
In re-reading my earlier response, it dawned on me that the type of file
I emailed were normal 80 byte records. If you need to email a true
"file", here is som
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Thanks Gary.
Just the summary. It's 113 lines. We send it without signature also. How
would I get the contents into i
iscussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Thanks Gary.
Just the summary. It's 113 lines. We send it without signature also. How
would I get the contents into into the body of a
2008 8:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Can't say Dean... I write the output as well, edit it down to the one
page, print it for the manager to sign and then fax it over, -and-, as a
heads-up, email them a copy of the unsigned report. I "do know" that
I'm in the same boat. I'd like the address also.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Field, Alan C.
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Raymond,
I'm lazy
frame Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond Noal
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 19:57
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
We FTP our SCRT reports to IBM and they have no problem with this approach.
HTH
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Tech
Really...? I'll pass that along.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Raymond Noal
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
We FTP our SCRT reports to IBM and
: Thursday, January 10, 2008 5:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
Can't say Dean... I write the output as well, edit it down to the one page,
print it for the manager to sign and then fax it over, -and-, as a heads-up,
email them a copy of the unsigned report. I &qu
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
We right the output to a file, can we just FTP it ? Will they accept it like
that ?
-Original Message-
accept it
> like that ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Gary Green
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:02 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
>
>
> Automatically sen
We right the output to a file, can we just FTP it ? Will they accept it
like that ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sub-CEC Reports
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Sub-CEC Reports
Hi,
Has anybody automated sending the report to IBM ? If so, how'd you do it ?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting
Hi,
Has anybody automated sending the report to IBM ? If so, how'd you do it
?
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 9608
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / s
27 matches
Mail list logo
