Re: Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site

2007-08-06 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 10:59 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site > I spent my t

Re: Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site

2007-08-06 Thread Rick Fochtman
Actually, I did, a the back-of-the-envelope risk analysis indicated that the likely delay of 6.2 million years before likely exposure was deemed acceptable, interstellar terrorism by the Romulan Empire and Vogon constructor fleets notwithstand

Re: Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site

2007-08-06 Thread Staller, Allan
You forgot the Borg! Actually, I did, a the back-of-the-envelope risk analysis indicated that the likely delay of 6.2 million years before likely exposure was deemed acceptable, interstellar terrorism by the Romulan Empire and Vogon constructor fleets notwithstanding. -

Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site

2007-08-06 Thread David Boyes
>From:Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I take it that you have not considered the possibility of a supernova. Actually, I did, a the back-of-the-envelope risk analysis indicated that the likely delay of 6.2 million years before likely exposure was deemed acceptable, interstellar terrorism