Re: Supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread Craddock, Chris
The subject says it all, I am trying to find out if there is a supported+documented interface to set and retrieve the TCBUSER word from a NON-authorized program WITHOUT writing any authorized code. I tried a simple ST instruction, but that's an 0C4 storage violation. TIA for any

Re: Supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 10:15 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed? The subject says it all, I am trying to find out

Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread john gilmore
Chris Craddock writes: If you're looking for a place to hang things, use name/token services. and that is sovereign advice if you need a facility for communication among, say, independent tasks or address spaces. Name/token services can also be used within a single task, but for this

Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed? snip

Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread john gilmore
John McKown writes: Do DXD and CXD work for communications between modules which are dynamically LOADed or LINKed to? I think that they only work for modules which are composite linked (bound?). Like FORTRAN Named Common. Although the mechanism used is not like FORTRAN named common and its C

Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread Don Poitras
McKown, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john gilmore Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed

Re: supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-07-21 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/21/2005 at 10:25 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Do DXD and CXD work for communications between modules which are dynamically LOADed or LINKed to? No. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Supported interface to set/retrieve TCBUSER field NON-authori zed?

2005-06-22 Thread Knutson, Sam
For vendors there has been a viable alternative to CVTUSER or RYO techniques for a while now. IBM can assign a slot in the vendor nee customer CVT table anchored from the ECVT. ECVTCTBL DCV(CSRCTABL) Customer anchor table. * Slots assigned by