In a recent note, ibm-main said:
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:25:20 +1000
>
> From: "Matt Simpson">
> > This isn't quite as flexible as yours, but I got some JCL from a vendor
> > that creatively inverted the usual way the test works.
> ...
> > An interesting way of twisting the provided f
ibm-main wrote:
From: "Matt Simpson">
This isn't quite as flexible as yours, but I got some JCL from a vendor
that creatively inverted the usual way the test works.
...
An interesting way of twisting the provided function to do something
different.
gil, (wher's gil) - stand up and take a
From: "Matt Simpson">
> This isn't quite as flexible as yours, but I got some JCL from a vendor
> that creatively inverted the usual way the test works.
...
> An interesting way of twisting the provided function to do something
different.
gil, (wher's gil) - stand up and take a bow man.
Unless I
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:14:17 -0700, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I got frustrated at the inability to test anything other than return
>codes the like with JCL IF.
This isn't quite as flexible as yours, but I got some JCL from a vendor that
creatively inverted the usual way the test
I got frustrated at the inability to test anything other than return
codes the like with JCL IF. Maybe I'm re-inventing the wheel here, but I
wrote a little Rexx script that reduced my frustration.
INTERP interprets the value of its argument and returns the result as
its return code. So you can fo
5 matches
Mail list logo
