In a recent note, john gilmore said:
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:00:49 +
>
> Transmission latency is easily measured and corrected for where it is
> important; and there are both theory and practice for doing so already in
> place, elaborated for use in adjusting and rationalizing the
I have just conducted a small experiment. During a set of five five-minute
intervals The BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) website's
current-UTC value transmission from Sèvres (near Paris) to my workstation in
Ashland (near Boston) had a mean transmission-delay of 0.11 sec and mi
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> In a recent note, Curt Thompson said:
>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:40:27 -0500
> >
> > companies are building-out locations that are further apart in
> > distances, the latency may prove unacceptable. An example
> where this
> > may be important is during tr
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Time Synchronization Latency
>
>
> In a recent note, Curt Thompson said:
>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:40:27 -0500
> >
> > companies are building-out locations that are further apart
> in di
In a recent note, Curt Thompson said:
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:40:27 -0500
>
> companies are building-out locations that are further apart in distances,
> the latency may prove unacceptable. An example where this may be important
> is during troubleshooting, where review of logs, etc m
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:40:27 -0500, Curt Thompson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>I have a general question regarding the time synchronization across
>heterogeneous servers that span thousands of miles apart from each other.
>I have a large sysplex and distributed server environment, utilizing
Hello,
I have a general question regarding the time synchronization across
heterogeneous servers that span thousands of miles apart from each other.
I have a large sysplex and distributed server environment, utilizing an IP
network. I have an NTP instance running on several of my MF servers, in
wh
7 matches
Mail list logo
