In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/01/2005
at 03:19 PM, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I suspect the need to handle things like long filenames and other new
>world stuff will doom these programs in the long term.
Probably, but it's the migration that I'm concerned with.
>Since z/OS suppor
Sorry about the belated response.
On 30 Jun 2005 14:58:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/29/2005
> at 08:40 PM, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>Shmeul
>
>That's Shmuel!
I claim bad typing because I looked up one of your posts to get it
righ
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/29/2005
at 08:40 PM, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Shmeul
That's Shmuel!
>For the rest of the points raised I am making the following
>assumptions and need to understand if they are correct.
No. PL/I supports BSAM.
>4 Few if any applications programs
uot;, no matter the locality of the data.
-Original Message-
From: Clark Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Transition requirements for new world was Re: z/OS future needs
was Re: USS in a "legacy" world
In the exchange
In the exchange below there is an important point about how we get
from where we are to where the system is going. Shmeul is saying we
will need a compatibility interface for BSAM and BPAM while I am
contending this won't be necessary. We may or may not be as far apart
as the discussion below ind
In the exchange below there is an important point about how we get
from where we are to where the system is going. Shmeul is saying we
will need a compatibility interface for BSAM and BPAM while I am
contending this won't be necessary. We may or may not be as far apart
as the discussion below ind
6 matches
Mail list logo
