I prefer:
BAC Broken As Coded
John P. Baker
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted
MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: UR1 vs FIN
>The APAR closing codes
>The APAR closing codes are:
You forgot:
WAD Working As Designed
And (humour?):
BAD Broken As Designed
FN Fixed Never
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-
Roger Bolan wrote:
UR1 is used for changes that are regarded as "new function" or some kind
of improvement or enhancement that was not technically a "programming
error" (close code PER) because the program was implementing what the
programming specification had said it should do. It also mean
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:24:08 -0400, Robert Wright wrote:
>
> OA25428, for example, let current IPCS developers know that a
>developer 14 years ago made a data entry field on one panel two
>characters too narrow to accept the widest item that can properly be
>entered there. Hopefully, a lot of the
M Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: UR1 vs FIN
Roger Bolan wrote:
>
> FIN means "fixed in next", but this does not absolutely guarantee
that there will be a "next release". That's why you might have heard it
as "fixed IF ne
Roger Bolan wrote:
>
> FIN means "fixed in next", but this does not absolutely guarantee
that there will be a "next release". That's why you might have heard it
as "fixed IF next". It's generally used for certain kinds of changes
that are only allowed to happen on a release boundary (like a
nt.com
Boulder, Colorado, USA
P Think before you print
Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
06/16/2008 09:36 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
UR1 vs FIN
I'm being offered "UR1&q
Brian Peterson wrote:
FIN Fixed in next release
UR1 Programming error in the reported release; the problem has been
corrected in a release not yet available from distribution
Sounds like "UR1" means something to the effect that the problem has actually
been fixed in an announced
- Original Message -
From: "Edward Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:36 AM
Subject: UR1 vs FIN
I'm being offered "UR1" closure for an APAR. The description sounds just
like "FIN" clos
>From ServiceLink User's Guide Document Number SH52-0300-10 September
1996, as found in VM IBMLink:
Appendix B.1 APAR Closing Codes
The APAR closing codes are:
ADM A partia
I'm being offered "UR1" closure for an APAR. The description sounds just
like "FIN" closure. Is there a difference?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
11 matches
Mail list logo