Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-23 Thread John P. Baker
I prefer: BAC Broken As Coded John P. Baker -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: UR1 vs FIN >The APAR closing codes

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-23 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>The APAR closing codes are: You forgot: WAD Working As Designed And (humour?): BAD Broken As Designed FN Fixed Never - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-17 Thread Edward Jaffe
Roger Bolan wrote: UR1 is used for changes that are regarded as "new function" or some kind of improvement or enhancement that was not technically a "programming error" (close code PER) because the program was implementing what the programming specification had said it should do. It also mean

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:24:08 -0400, Robert Wright wrote: > > OA25428, for example, let current IPCS developers know that a >developer 14 years ago made a data entry field on one panel two >characters too narrow to accept the widest item that can properly be >entered there. Hopefully, a lot of the

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Roger Bolan
M Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: UR1 vs FIN Roger Bolan wrote: > > FIN means "fixed in next", but this does not absolutely guarantee that there will be a "next release". That's why you might have heard it as "fixed IF ne

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Robert Wright
Roger Bolan wrote: > > FIN means "fixed in next", but this does not absolutely guarantee that there will be a "next release". That's why you might have heard it as "fixed IF next". It's generally used for certain kinds of changes that are only allowed to happen on a release boundary (like a

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Roger Bolan
nt.com Boulder, Colorado, USA P Think before you print Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 06/16/2008 09:36 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject UR1 vs FIN I'm being offered "UR1&q

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Edward Jaffe
Brian Peterson wrote: FIN Fixed in next release UR1 Programming error in the reported release; the problem has been corrected in a release not yet available from distribution Sounds like "UR1" means something to the effect that the problem has actually been fixed in an announced

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Pinnacle
- Original Message - From: "Edward Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:36 AM Subject: UR1 vs FIN I'm being offered "UR1" closure for an APAR. The description sounds just like "FIN" clos

Re: UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Brian Peterson
>From ServiceLink User's Guide Document Number SH52-0300-10 September 1996, as found in VM IBMLink: Appendix B.1 APAR Closing Codes The APAR closing codes are: ADM A partia

UR1 vs FIN

2008-06-16 Thread Edward Jaffe
I'm being offered "UR1" closure for an APAR. The description sounds just like "FIN" closure. Is there a difference? -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/