Re: VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-10 Thread Casey Rhodes
We have also seen this and opened an ETR with IBM. We were pointed to OA20748. If I remember correctly it was on a 1.7 system. The APAR points to 1K0. I believe that is 1.7. We have not seen this on a 1.8 system as of yet. --

VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-09 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
Is anyone seeing situations where VLF is periodically taking unusually high CPU on a v1.8 system? We have seen this on our test system and can't relate it to any other activity happening on the system. Thanks, Jon Jon L. Veilleux [EMAIL PROTECTED] (860) 636-2683 This e-mail may contain

Re: VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 9 May 2007 08:27:37 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone seeing situations where VLF is periodically taking unusually high CPU on a v1.8 system? We have seen this on our test system and can't relate it to any other activity happening on the system. Thanks, Jon I just

Re: VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-09 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
snip I just compared the total CPU time via SDSF on 2 similar systems that were both IPLed a few weeks ago - one z/OS 1.8 and the other z/OS 1.6. The numbers were very close, so nothing unusual in that environment. /snip Mark, this only happens occasionally. We went for a while with no problem

Re: VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-09 Thread Mark Jacobs
Veilleux, Jon L wrote: snip I just compared the total CPU time via SDSF on 2 similar systems that were both IPLed a few weeks ago - one z/OS 1.8 and the other z/OS 1.6. The numbers were very close, so nothing unusual in that environment. /snip Mark, this only happens occasionally. We went for

Re: VLF on z/OS 1.8

2007-05-09 Thread Brian Peterson
APAR OA20748? Talks about CPU spikes in VLF if using catalogs in ECS mode. The APAR is currently open. It's a catalog APAR, so only applicable if using ECS. Brian On Wed, 9 May 2007 08:27:37 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote: Is anyone seeing situations where VLF is periodically taking