-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Assunto: Re: XPAF replacement
Hello Mr. Neto,
I suspect that the information you have received may have been misinterpreted
from a notice that went out last year which stated that End of Support for XPAF
V3.X would be effective December 15th, 2011. The notice further mentioned
tha
On 10 May 2012 17:57:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Hello Mr. Neto,
>
>I suspect that the information you have received may have been misinterpreted
>from a notice that went out last year which stated that End of Support for
>XPAF V3.X would be effective December 15th, 2011. Th
Hello Mr. Neto,
I suspect that the information you have received may have been misinterpreted
from a notice that went out last year which stated that End of Support for XPAF
V3.X would be effective December 15th, 2011. The notice further mentioned
that all current XPAF customers should migrat
On 05/09/2012 01:40 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 13:12:52 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:37:18 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Another one of those message formats that appears to Thunderbird as
"garbage". I can read it fine on the ibm-main online archive, where
On Wed, 9 May 2012 13:12:52 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
>On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:37:18 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>
>>Another one of those message formats that appears to Thunderbird as
>>"garbage". I can read it fine on the ibm-main online archive, where is
>>shows Ituriel's readable message follo
On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:37:18 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>Another one of those message formats that appears to Thunderbird as
>"garbage". I can read it fine on the ibm-main online archive, where is
>shows Ituriel's readable message followed by the ibm-main trailer lines,
>but it must be arriving
Another one of those message formats that appears to Thunderbird as
"garbage". I can read it fine on the ibm-main online archive, where is
shows Ituriel's readable message followed by the ibm-main trailer lines,
but it must be arriving in a format that ibm-main doesn't fully
understand, as its
íz{S©ì}êÄÊ xjǺà*'µéíO*^µìmþZw!j»
íz{S©ì}êÄÊ xjǺà*'µéíO*^µìmþZw!j»
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto wrote:
>We are XPAF users and XEROX told us that this product is no longer
>supported in Latin America.
That's odd. Xerox posted some XPAF updates this very week, and I think XPAF
5.0 debuted only last year.
What printers (and models) must you continue supporting?
Hi all,
We are XPAF users and XEROX told us that this product is no longer
supported in Latin America.
Do you know any replacement for this product ?
Your help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
BANCO BRADESCO S.A.
425
11 matches
Mail list logo
