Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-23 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:50:06 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote: We have a degausser (really old) and I don't know the name, model, etc. The objective is to destroy data so that it cannot be read and, no, tapes are not to be reused. This is a security measure since the data

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-23 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jan MOEYERSONS On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:50:06 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov wrote: We have a degausser (really old) and I don't know the name, model, etc. The objective is to destroy data so that

degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
I want to verify that tapes that have been degaussed are really wiped clean of data.I took one tape that is in delete status in TMS and made an outside label (SYT001) and using DITTO, tried to dump the tape label. The job gets an IOS000I with error code of NCA which says: NCA

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Staller, Allan
Sounds like you've got it nailed. snip I want to verify that tapes that have been degaussed are really wiped clean of data.I took one tape that is in delete status in TMS and made an outside label (SYT001) and using DITTO, tried to dump the tape label. The job gets an IOS000I with error

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:27:32 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I want to verify that tapes that have been degaussed are really wiped clean of data.I took one tape that is in delete status in TMS and made an outside label (SYT001) and using DITTO, tried to dump the tape label. The job gets an

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Kanawha Blvd East Charleston, WV 25305 (304)558-5914 ext 58292 (304)558-1441 fax -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:03 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: degaussed tapes On Mon

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Ken Porowski
, August 22, 2011 11:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] degaussed tapes I also tried TP (tape print) for 50 blocks, but I get the same error. There are over 100 tapes that we have been asked to verify ( a sampling of several hundred ) so pulling tape out, etc is not feasible really

degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread john gilmore
, notionally at least, accomplish only 1), leaving these media reusable after reinitialization. If, as I suspect, you hope to reuse these tapes, it will probably be necessary for you to reinitialize and write-read test them. There have been some incidents in which degaussed tapes were

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Crabtree, Anne D
Subject: degaussed tapes Anne, May I infer from your second post that you are degaussing tapes only as a security measure, to destroy the data written on them? This topic has a large literature. Some degaussing processes both 1) destroy the data recorded on magnetic media and 2) render these media

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Ken Porowski
you plan to do with the tapes? Reuse, sell, landfill? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Crabtree, Anne D Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] degaussed tapes I also tried TP

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:12:56 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: I also tried TP (tape print) for 50 blocks, but I get the same error. There are over 100 tapes that we have been asked to verify ( a sampling of several hundred ) so pulling tape out, etc is not feasible really. I intended to

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Ken Porowski
is intact. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] degaussed tapes On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:50:06 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D wrote

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:50:06 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: We have a degausser (really old) and I don't know the name, model, etc. The objective is to destroy data so that it cannot be read and, no, tapes are not to be reused. This is a security measure since the data that was on them was

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 15:37 + on 08/22/2011, john gilmore wrote about degaussed tapes: Anne, May I infer from your second post that you are degaussing tapes only as a security measure, to destroy the data written on them? This topic has a large literature. Some degaussing processes both 1) destroy

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Scott Rowe
] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] degaussed tapes On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:50:06 -0400, Crabtree, Anne D wrote: We have a degausser (really old) and I don't know the name, model, etc. The objective

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Jonathan Goossen
: 651-361-4541 Department Support Line: 651-361- IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 08/22/2011 10:50:06 AM: From: Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 08/22/2011 10:59 AM Subject: Re: degaussed tapes Sent by: IBM Mainframe

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Stephen Mednick
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ken Porowski Sent: Tuesday, 23 August 2011 1:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: degaussed tapes Can you reinitialize the tape and then try the DITTO? In the future you might want

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Rick Fochtman
-snip-- I want to verify that tapes that have been degaussed are really wiped clean of data.I took one tape that is in delete status in TMS and made an outside label (SYT001) and using DITTO, tried to dump the tape

Re: degaussed tapes

2011-08-22 Thread Robert A. Rosenberg
At 12:11 -0400 on 08/22/2011, Ken Porowski wrote about Re: degaussed tapes: I thought the 3590, 3592 had a chip in them that would be destroyed by degaussing, not sure if even the manufacturer can reinit although data recovery specialists may be able to use them if the tape is intact